Special MSNBC post-debate analysis with Rachel Maddow and a panel of her MSNBC colleagues

Special MSNBC post-debate analysis with Rachel Maddow and a panel of her MSNBC colleagues

Released Wednesday, 2nd October 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Special MSNBC post-debate analysis with Rachel Maddow and a panel of her MSNBC colleagues

Special MSNBC post-debate analysis with Rachel Maddow and a panel of her MSNBC colleagues

Special MSNBC post-debate analysis with Rachel Maddow and a panel of her MSNBC colleagues

Special MSNBC post-debate analysis with Rachel Maddow and a panel of her MSNBC colleagues

Wednesday, 2nd October 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Subscribe to MSNBC Premium on

0:02

Apple Podcasts to get new

0:04

episodes of Morning Joe and

0:06

the Rachel Maddow Show ad-free.

0:09

Plus ad-free listening to all

0:11

of Rachel Maddow's original series,

0:13

Ultra, Backman and Dejan News.

0:15

And all MSNBC original podcasts

0:17

are available ad-free and with

0:20

bonus content including How to

0:22

Win 2024, prosecuting

0:25

Donald Trump, Why is this happening,

0:27

Velshi Band Book Club and more.

0:30

Right now with MSNBC Premium you can listen

0:32

to the latest episode of How to Win

0:34

2024. Available

0:36

exclusively to subscribers, presidential historian

0:39

Michael Beschloss takes a deep

0:41

dive into some of the

0:43

most notable moments in past

0:45

vice presidential debates and how

0:47

they've moved the needle in

0:49

past elections. Subscribe to MSNBC

0:52

Premium on Apple Podcasts. The

0:56

vice presidential candidates debate wraps

0:58

up at CBS

1:00

News headquarters in New York

1:02

City. You see the candidates

1:05

there being joined by their wives, Usha

1:07

Vance and Gwen Walls. A

1:09

cordial debate between these two men.

1:12

I wouldn't describe them as evenly matched

1:14

because they are so different. So

1:17

different in style and so different on

1:19

substance. Very interested to

1:22

hear from the spin room to hear from all of my colleagues

1:24

here to get to all of the analysis that we're going to

1:26

get to. I think the big

1:28

picture take away from this is that

1:30

one of these candidates is much slicker

1:32

than the other is a much more

1:34

practiced kind of professional debate style

1:37

speaker and the other candidate

1:39

one. There

1:41

was one bad moment for Tim Walls in this

1:43

debate where he got mixed up and embarrassed and

1:45

answering a question about exactly what month he had

1:47

been in China in relation to the Tiananmen Square protest. But

1:51

then on guns, on

1:53

January 6th, on Obamacare, on

1:56

the economy, on blaming everything

1:58

on the border. back

2:00

again on health care, on abortion, on

2:04

every issue on substance.

2:08

J.D. Vance was very polished and very

2:11

slick, and Tim Walz

2:14

beat him on all the substantive points. At least

2:16

that was my take on it. I

2:18

do think that there was one very

2:21

blunt, very easily disprovable lie

2:23

on a very important issue

2:26

that is going to be real trouble for J.D.

2:28

Vance coming out of this, which was him saying

2:30

I never supported a national ban on abortion. J.D.

2:33

Vance is bluntly on the record and

2:36

on tape saying I

2:38

want abortion to be illegal

2:41

nationwide. His actual quote

2:43

was, I certainly would like abortion

2:45

to be illegal nationally. Saying I

2:47

never supported a national abortion ban

2:49

when that's out there is something

2:51

you're never going to shake in

2:54

your campaign, particularly when so much

2:56

of the country is mobilized on this issue

2:58

of reproductive rights, the first presidential election

3:01

after the fall of Roe versus Wade. Nicole.

3:05

Why am I always first? Because you lost the

3:07

short straw. So I think

3:09

that J.D. Vance spent the night sort of

3:11

building an intricate and beautiful Ford out of

3:13

toothpicks. And it was perfect. And

3:15

at the end, he sneezed on it,

3:17

the whole thing fell apart, and he had to

3:19

walk out of that room over the broken toothpicks.

3:22

I think that God bless the people

3:24

who watched the whole thing and stayed locked in on it. I

3:26

checked in with about 20 people all to do this

3:28

and watch this for a living. And they were kind

3:30

of in and out of some parts of it. But

3:34

no matter how you watch this, if you

3:36

cannot say what happened in 2020, and

3:40

the only reason you're there is because what

3:42

actually happened in 2020 is that Donald Trump

3:44

sent his supporters to hang Mike Pence. Just

3:46

ask them. Yeah. Then you

3:48

lose. And I think that, you know,

3:51

Governor Walts had a lot of

3:53

great moments. Tim Walz built that

3:55

perfect artifice. I mean, J.D.

3:57

Vance built this perfect artifice. He was speaking.

3:59

thinking as though he were running to be

4:02

Mitt Romney's wife. I mean, he spoke tonight.

4:04

It was a performance that was kind

4:07

of amazing and totally disconnected from the

4:09

person who he's running

4:11

with, Donald Trump. But still unable to

4:13

say that Trump lost the election in

4:15

2020. And in that moment, unable to

4:18

say it. In the moment, I think

4:20

everything that he did for 88 minutes

4:22

was lost and wiped out by that

4:25

one inability to tell the truth in

4:27

front of a huge television audience. Well,

4:29

that moment was the moment of the

4:31

night. I mean, it's like, wait, why

4:33

is he here? Oh,

4:36

right. The Mike Pence thing. Right? So

4:38

that was the moment of the night. J.D. Vance is

4:40

very good at this, right? I mean, this is what he's been

4:42

doing since he was in college in the

4:44

Yale Law. Like talking to libs and being kind of

4:46

like, well, I sort of agree with you here, but

4:48

here's the other part of this. Like, and he did

4:50

that all perfectly fine. There were,

4:53

I thought, walls on the substance, particularly on

4:55

healthcare, was very, very strong on healthcare on

4:57

the sort of basic of like the tax cuts and who

5:00

you're fighting for. Again, these are meat

5:02

and potato core messages. The two moments that I think

5:04

kind of broke me a little bit, I don't know

5:06

about the median information level

5:08

of the viewer, the

5:10

level of gaslighting to say that Donald

5:14

Trump saved the ACA. Yes,

5:16

he saved Obamacare. Like, we've

5:18

madly gone up on national

5:20

television and said that Donald

5:22

Trump had saved Obamacare. In

5:24

a bipartisan way. In

5:26

a bipartisan way. And despite the fact, trying to

5:28

reveal it multiple times, and Waltz had a very

5:30

good fact check on that. And then I

5:33

thought nothing was going to top that, but what

5:36

topped it was he handed power over

5:38

peacefully on January 20th. I said it

5:40

twice. Yes. When the coup failed

5:42

and the cops brains had all been bashed

5:45

in and there were actual dead bodies and

5:47

blood on the Capitol, 14 days

5:50

later, we did manage to actually do it.

5:52

And he didn't show up for the transfer

5:54

of power, by the way. He said it's

5:56

really rich for Democratic leaders to say Trump

5:58

is a unique threat to democracy. when

6:00

he peacefully gave over power on January the

6:03

20th. And everybody's like, what is

6:05

that alternate universe in which that happened I would

6:07

like to visit? It seems nice and much less

6:09

violent. Joy. Yeah, I mean,

6:11

at that moment when Tim Wal said, you

6:13

really can't answer that question. You really can't say

6:15

that Donald Trump lost the election. You can't do

6:17

that. That was the moment of the night. But

6:19

I was just going through and catalog, you guys

6:22

have mentioned some of them. He said there were

6:24

25 million undocumented immigrants in the country. It's probably

6:26

more like 15, 16. He

6:28

said that he repeatedly

6:30

lied about Springfield again and did it so

6:32

insistently that he had to have his mic

6:35

muted because he kept trying to jump in

6:37

and continue to lie about these people. He

6:39

said they were brought in through something called

6:41

the CBP1 app. And

6:43

that is an app that immigrants can use to

6:45

come in and get a certain kind of visa.

6:47

That was launched in 2020 under,

6:50

drum roll, Donald Trump. He says

6:53

that he never supported a national

6:55

abortion ban. I have here a

6:57

printout that is already circulating all

6:59

over social media. This is

7:02

from the campaign website of J.D. Vance when

7:07

he ran for the United States Senate. It is

7:09

headlined End Abortion.

7:12

He says he's 100% pro-life, believes abortion has

7:14

turned his society into a place where we

7:16

see children's and inconvenience, on and on and

7:18

on. You also gave one of the quotes,

7:20

I would certainly like to see abortion illegal

7:22

nationally. He also said he was sympathetic to

7:24

the view that a national ban would be

7:26

necessary to stop women from traveling across states

7:29

to obtain an abortion. So he's in favor

7:31

of a sort of fugitive slave act to

7:34

stop abortion. So he said that as well.

7:36

He blamed undocumented immigrants for everything from rising

7:38

house prices, rising food prices, inflation, maybe ghosts

7:41

and bad weather. I mean, he was blaming

7:43

undocumented immigrants for every single thing. I think

7:45

Tim Walz was really skillful in knocking those

7:47

things down individually because he was speaking as

7:50

a governor and could speak from his own

7:52

experience. He did a great job talking about

7:54

housing costs and how those actually worked. The

7:56

bipartisan way to save healthcare was absolutely absurd.

7:59

He said, He said, most of our solar

8:01

panels are coming from China. It's literally the

8:03

opposite. Google the Department of Education that says,

8:06

80% of our solar panels come from,

8:08

drum roll, the United States. Trump peacefully gave

8:11

over power on January 20, kinda

8:13

skipped January 6th when he was trying to overthrow

8:15

the government. He couldn't answer the question, did Trump

8:17

lose the election? A smooth

8:19

lie is still alive. J.D.

8:21

Vance is incredibly smooth, but

8:24

he said, number one, nothing memorable. There's

8:27

nothing clippable in what he said. They

8:29

were just all smooth bland lies. He

8:31

got out done by

8:33

Tim Walz, who may be awkward. He

8:35

may got hit, took him a while to get

8:37

warmed up, but he won the debate because he

8:39

actually had substance, he was relatable, and he didn't

8:42

go in there to slay J.D. Vance.

8:45

He went in there to show himself,

8:47

and he showed himself to be bipartisan.

8:49

He showed himself to be reasonable. He

8:51

showed himself to be practical. He acted

8:54

as a governor. And a

8:56

lot of people are complaining that he didn't

8:58

knock J.D. Vance out, and that he wasn't

9:00

rhetorically cruel, but that was not his job.

9:02

It was obvious that his job was to

9:04

sell Kamala Harris as president.

9:06

He did that very well. He won

9:08

the debate. I wrote a note to

9:10

myself that he was not on offense

9:12

against Vance in the first half of

9:14

the debate, and then he came back

9:16

after that break, right? After the break,

9:18

it was like, just destroyed him on

9:21

healthcare, and then the January 6th, January

9:23

20th thing, I mean, I

9:25

scratched out my own note. True, he was

9:27

not on offense against Vance for the first

9:29

half of the debate, and then he came

9:31

back and more than made up for it.

9:33

Yeah, right. You know, he will be remembered

9:35

for that final exchange about, you know, did

9:38

Trump lose the election, and he doesn't

9:40

answer. His technique is to not answer.

9:42

It makes him, by the way, the

9:44

very first vice presidential candidate in history

9:46

who doesn't know who won the election.

9:49

That's his place to be. That's his

9:51

place to be. Where did you

9:53

see this job list? Are

9:55

you Republicans already in office? It

9:57

came at the end of a long

9:59

list. of questions that he simply didn't

10:02

answer. He said words but didn't answer.

10:04

For example, the first one he didn't

10:06

answer. Donald Trump says,

10:08

climate change is a hoax. Do you

10:10

agree? That's a one word answer, yes

10:13

or no. He didn't answer

10:15

that. He just kept talking. And

10:18

he was then asked, will you

10:20

separate parents from

10:23

children, even if the children are

10:25

US citizens? No answer. Did

10:27

not answer that question. Donald

10:30

Trump's budget plan will cost $5

10:33

trillion added to the national

10:36

debt. What's your solution to that? No answer.

10:41

Will you monitor pregnancy? Got an answer, he

10:43

said no. Actually said no to that. Finally,

10:46

there was an answer. He

10:49

was then asked, where are

10:51

you going to seize the federal

10:54

lands to

10:56

build on? And he gave no answer.

10:58

Now, that's a really important question. If

11:01

you're trying to build anything in America, we really

11:03

want to know where it is. And a lot

11:05

of people don't want it to be in their

11:07

backyard. And then, of course, Walls followed up on

11:10

that by saying, so when you seize the federal

11:12

land for the housing, is that also the federal

11:14

land you're seizing for the drilling? Are we having

11:16

people live in the world, Darks? Are they all

11:19

going to be together? No answer. Yeah, no answer.

11:23

And then we get to the final big

11:25

no answer, which is going to be on

11:27

a loop now of did he lose the

11:29

election and the inability to answer that. And

11:31

so just on that

11:33

very simple debate concept

11:36

of, here's the question and you answer

11:38

it, he lost spectacularly on any scorecard

11:40

when you just give him a zero

11:42

for every single one that he didn't

11:45

answer. Can I say something about the

11:47

moderators? Because we spend

11:49

a lot of time on it before the debate. And they

11:52

defied whatever. I mean, they did a

11:54

great job. And

11:57

they also used their mic muting

11:59

power. And I actually think if you're

12:02

a woman, that might be the worst moment

12:04

J.D. Vance had, because he was going to

12:06

mansplain right over that mute button. And

12:09

again, I don't pretend to know how everyone

12:12

will react to this. I think that a

12:14

lot of women in positions

12:16

of authority that should command respect just

12:18

by virtue of that dynamic will see

12:21

themselves and some do the disrespect of

12:23

them and talked over. I

12:25

mean, there was a moment like that with

12:27

the vice presidential in the Harris-Pence debate where

12:30

she said, I'm speaking. There is

12:32

this real belief that what he had to say

12:34

was more important than the debate rules and the

12:36

moderator. And to Joy's

12:38

point, the substance of that moment

12:40

was when he was lying about

12:43

immigrants in Springfield, Ohio again. And

12:45

Tim Walz had called him out on it. And then

12:48

he was trying to say, no, no, no, no, I'm

12:50

not lying. Let me tell you why I'm calling them

12:52

illegal immigrants, even though they are not

12:54

illegal immigrants. Let me mansplain the law to

12:56

you. And the moderators in

12:58

that point not only muted his mic, but

13:00

said, thank you for explaining the law. It's

13:03

not what we're asking you about. But that's

13:05

when he also complained about being fact checked.

13:07

Saying the rules said you cannot fact check

13:09

me. That's one of the things that's in

13:12

the video that we'll be hearing a lot of. Norah

13:14

O'Donnell did a fact check that

13:16

was indirect at the end of the

13:18

climate change discussion and the discussion ended.

13:21

And she just said directly the overwhelming

13:23

consensus among scientists is climate change

13:25

is warming at an unprecedented rate. She

13:27

just said it, not in a direct

13:30

confrontation to J.D. Vance. So I saw

13:32

that and I thought, OK, there's that

13:34

method. But then when it was a

13:37

direct fact check to J.D. Vance,

13:39

he did complain that CBS was violating

13:41

its own rule. This podcast is supported

13:43

by Planned Parenthood Federation of America. Planned

13:46

Parenthood Federation of America exists so all

13:48

people can get access to the sexual

13:50

and reproductive care and education they

13:52

need. Planned Parenthood organizations advocate for health

13:55

equity and policies that allow people the

13:57

freedom to control their own bodies. More

14:01

than 2 million patients a year

14:03

rely on Planned Parenthood Health Center

14:05

services, like STI testing and treatment,

14:07

birth control, gender-affirming care, abortion, cancer

14:09

screenings, and more. Reproductive

14:12

health care and rights are under attack from public

14:14

officials who are out of step with the will

14:16

of the vast majority of Americans. The

14:18

constitutional right to abortion has been stolen,

14:21

and politicians in 47 states have introduced bills

14:23

that would block people from

14:25

getting the sexual and reproductive care they need.

14:28

Planned Parenthood knows that equitable access to health

14:30

care, including safe, legal abortion,

14:32

is a human right. Right

14:34

now, Planned Parenthood needs your help to protect

14:36

access to health care. Donate

14:39

today by visiting plannedparenthood.org/protect.

14:43

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell. When I worked for

14:46

Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, I learned about

14:48

commitment. Building New York's newest train station

14:50

was Senator Moynihan's idea. It took 30

14:52

years, and never giving up. When

14:57

we register to vote, we make a lifetime commitment

14:59

to democracy, a commitment to vote

15:01

for all levels of government, working together to

15:04

build a better America. The

15:07

Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell,

15:09

weeknights at 10pm Eastern on

15:11

MSNBC. The

15:13

World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim is a brand

15:15

new podcast from Sky News. With

15:18

me, Sky News' lead world news presenter, Yalda

15:20

Hakim. And me, Richard Engel, chief

15:22

foreign correspondent for NBC News. Every

15:24

week, we'll be reporting from the front line

15:27

of the world's trouble spots and asking the

15:29

big questions to the world's most important and

15:31

influential people. Join us to help you

15:33

understand what is happening in the world today and why

15:35

it matters to you. So that's The World with Richard

15:38

Engel and Yalda Hakim. Launching October

15:40

9th. Listen every Wednesday, wherever you get

15:42

your podcasts. In

15:44

case you're just joining us, it's the top of the

15:46

hour. Let me say we're super grateful to have you

15:48

watching our coverage of the vice presidential debate here on

15:50

MSNBC. It was a debate that

15:52

I think started essentially as kind of a slow burn.

15:55

Like I thought, oh, this is going to be cordial,

15:57

which is good. I'm not sure what's

15:59

happening here. on the substance, the pace of it

16:02

was much slower at the beginning, and then

16:04

about midpoint, it really took off. And then we

16:06

had what I think was a, what

16:09

I thought was almost a knockout on

16:11

healthcare. I thought Walz basically knocked

16:13

out a Vance on healthcare. First of

16:15

all, he wobbled really badly on guns. We can talk about

16:17

that. He almost knocked him out on healthcare. And then when

16:19

we got to January 6th, he was out cold. There

16:22

was something about the debate too, just in sort of

16:24

tone and format to your point about the slow burn.

16:26

Like I remember that Chaney Lieberman debate in 2000, they

16:28

were sitting next to each other. It was very collegial,

16:30

very avuncular, very we agree on stuff. And there was

16:33

some of that vibe you saw a little bit of

16:35

like, oh, this is the JD Vance that made lots

16:37

of liberal friends at Yale. This is the Tim Walz

16:39

that won a very Republican district in really

16:41

difficult times, including 2010 when basically every other

16:43

Democrat got kicked out of the house. You

16:45

saw an ability to be able to like,

16:48

okay, I can talk to people who don't

16:50

agree with me. Right?

16:52

But the thing that really sort of like

16:55

cut it was to get back to that democracy

16:57

question in the end, which it

17:00

was interesting. Walz almost apologizes for

17:02

it where he says like, we're agreeing on a lot

17:04

of stuff and there's a lot of bipartisan. This is a

17:06

thing I can't go with you on. And I just

17:08

thought it was very human. You could tell you

17:11

could see it in his face because you

17:13

can hear when someone's throat is a

17:15

little close. He doesn't like fighting and

17:17

arguing. He doesn't like delivering the blow. It's not

17:19

who he is. He had to kind of steal

17:21

himself. He almost apologized for it. I'm so shocked. I'm

17:24

so shocked. I'm kind of bummed out by this

17:26

dude that you would say that. But it was, I

17:28

found that part all the more effective because of what

17:31

you were saying about that sort of like slow burn

17:33

and sort of collegiality and pretty wonky on stuff like

17:35

housing, which I thought was actually a good exchange and

17:37

sort of interesting. That part, it

17:39

was like, right, we can all

17:41

walk together and talk about these policy things up

17:44

to a point. But there is a point

17:46

at which we can't. And

17:48

I, Tim Walz, am saying this is really the point.

17:50

Let me just actually break the wall here a second.

17:52

Ask the control room. Do we have SOT-19? The

17:56

piece of sound that you're getting, that you're referring to, we're

17:58

going to try to turn around quicker than. It

18:00

takes us a second after the end of the debate to get

18:02

all these pieces of sound turns around. But

18:04

I think that one we've pulled. I just want people to hear exactly

18:07

what you're talking about here. Talk

18:10

about the state of democracy, the

18:12

top issue for Americans after the

18:14

economy and inflation. After

18:16

the 2020 election, President Trump's

18:19

campaign and others filed 62

18:21

lawsuits contesting the results. Judges,

18:24

including those appointed by President

18:26

Trump and other Republican presidents,

18:28

looked at the evidence and

18:30

said there was no widespread

18:32

fraud. The governors

18:34

of every state in the

18:36

nation, Republicans and Democrats, certified

18:38

the 2020 election

18:41

results and sent a legal slate

18:43

of electors to Congress for January

18:45

6th. Senator

18:47

Vance, you have said you would not

18:50

have certified the last presidential election and

18:52

would have asked the states to submit

18:54

alternative electors. That has

18:56

been called unconstitutional and illegal. Would

18:59

you again seek to challenge this year's

19:02

election results, even if every governor certifies

19:04

the results? I'll give you two minutes.

19:06

Well, Laura, first of all, I think

19:09

that we're focused on the future. I

19:14

just think for everyone tonight and

19:16

I'm going to thank Senator

19:18

Vance. I think this is the

19:20

conversation they want to hear. And I

19:23

think there's a lot of agreement. This is one that

19:25

we are miles apart on. This was

19:27

a threat to our democracy in a way that we

19:29

had not seen. And it manifested

19:31

itself because of Donald Trump's inability to say he

19:33

is still saying he didn't lose the election. I

19:35

would just ask that. Did he lose the 2020

19:38

election? Tim, I'm focused

19:40

on the future. Did Kamala Harris censor

19:42

Americans from speaking their mind in the

19:44

wake of the 2020 covid situation? That

19:48

is a damning that is a damning non-answer. The

19:52

verbal rejoinder there, half as powerful as the facial

19:54

expression in that moment. Yeah,

20:00

and that was a moment that was

20:02

coming all night. And I don't know

20:04

if Tim Walz deliberately held it to

20:06

that and waited for it to get

20:08

to that point. But it really was

20:10

the moment that kind of reshuffled

20:13

everything, as Nicole says, everything that you

20:15

thought you had heard in the last

20:17

88 minutes or so changed

20:19

in a way that was very, very, very

20:22

clear. That there's one person

20:24

here who is actually capable of

20:26

dealing with reality. And there's this

20:28

other person who will say anything,

20:30

whatever is necessary to say to

20:32

get through, to thread the

20:34

Trump needle to get where he has

20:37

to be on whatever the

20:39

question is. There was another great moment

20:41

where he was asked a

20:43

very simple direct question, how do you

20:45

protect pre-existing conditions in whatever the Trump

20:47

health care plan will be? And

20:50

his answer was, we already have a

20:52

law for that. That's correct. That is

20:55

Obamacare. That was the very first

20:58

law in American history that actually protected

21:00

people with pre-existing conditions and allows them

21:02

to get health insurance. And the great

21:04

thing about the question, how

21:06

do you protect pre-existing conditions? If you're just

21:08

talking to someone where there was

21:11

no health care plan in place in the

21:13

government, if that was your first

21:15

question, the answer to it actually has to

21:17

become an entire health

21:20

care system. It's

21:22

an answer that builds the entire Obamacare plan

21:24

from that one question, even though that is

21:26

listed as just one thing that it

21:28

does. In order to do that, you have

21:31

to do every other thing that Obamacare does,

21:33

including the subsidies and all that stuff.

21:35

And so that is one

21:37

of those policy questions that shows you

21:39

the utter emptiness of the man. In

21:41

policy terms, it's kind of identical to

21:43

the emptiness of his answer on who

21:45

won the election. And

21:48

for Wallace to be able to say in that

21:50

moment, I know a lot about health care. I've

21:52

worked on this a lot. It's really important in

21:54

my state. Let me just make this simple. What

21:56

you're talking about is the system we had before

21:58

Obamacare, which is why we needed Obamacare. And for

22:00

him to just cut through it all and say,

22:03

this policy that you think you're inventing here and

22:05

sounding all amazing about, that's what we had. And

22:07

that was the disaster that we needed this huge

22:09

reform to fix, that the country is very grateful

22:11

now, which you want to get rid of, which

22:13

Trump tried to get rid of, which only John

22:15

McCain saved us from him being able to get

22:18

rid of it. He just cut through it for

22:20

people who don't maybe have

22:22

the interest in the policy

22:24

in a specifics, but he

22:26

made it so clear in terms of what the stakes are there. It was sort

22:28

of perfectly done in his

22:30

very kind of folksy way.

22:32

Let's go to the spin room now

22:34

to where Illinois governor JB Pritzker is

22:37

standing by with our Alex Wagner. Alex.

22:39

Thanks Rachel. Governor, thank you for wading

22:41

through the scrum to join me here.

22:43

Let's talk about what happened on that

22:46

debate stage. Starting, I think probably with

22:48

Governor Walz's strongest answer, which unfortunately came

22:50

at the very end, but I'm optimistic

22:52

that people followed this to the 90

22:55

minutes. Talking about January 6th, what happened

22:57

at the Capitol and also the certification

22:59

of the 2020 election. He

23:02

wouldn't say who won the election. He

23:04

said, I want to talk about the

23:06

future. He basically suggested that Trump's interest

23:08

in all the lawsuits that he filed

23:10

or allies of his filed was about

23:12

an open conversation about the election. I

23:15

mean, I think Governor Walz gave the

23:17

line of the night when he said, Mike

23:19

Pence isn't on the stage. Where

23:21

is the firewall now? This

23:23

person suggesting that,

23:26

you know, J.D. Vance was not going

23:28

to do the thing that Mike Pence

23:30

did, but importantly, which is stand up

23:32

to Donald Trump as he tries to

23:34

subvert democracy. What did you think

23:36

about that moment? And how much do you think that

23:38

now is in the forefront of voters mind setting into

23:40

the last stretch of the election? This

23:43

election is about the future of our democracy.

23:45

And so that's why that question was so

23:47

important, even if it came at the very

23:49

end. Yeah. Because what you heard was J.D.

23:52

Vance not willing to say that Donald

23:54

Trump won the 2020 election. I mean,

23:56

how can you actually think that that

23:59

person? should be vice president of the

24:01

United States if he can't even admit

24:03

what is true, because, well,

24:05

he's the mini me for Donald Trump who

24:07

can't live up to the idea or can't,

24:10

you know, tell the truth about the 2020

24:12

election. So I think that we're,

24:14

you know, this was

24:16

the perfect frame for the rest

24:18

of the debate. If you look

24:20

back at the rest, what you'll

24:22

see is a slick debater and

24:24

JD Vance who consistently could not

24:26

answer a question. He just kept

24:28

shifting, shifting, shifting. And we

24:30

all know, for example, let's talk about

24:32

healthcare. We all know that Donald Trump

24:34

and the Republicans tried to, well,

24:37

pull back and end Obamacare.

24:39

Right? And over and

24:41

over again, they tried to do that. And yet that's

24:43

not what you heard from JD Vance. It was Tim

24:46

Walz who had to call him out on it and

24:48

make sure that he, you know, was

24:50

answering for the idea that, you know, they

24:52

want to take away the coverage for people

24:54

with preexisting conditions. They want to take away

24:56

coverage for, you know, your 26 year

24:59

olds and under who are covered

25:01

by the ACA. That over and over

25:03

you heard lies and kind of slick

25:05

answers from JD Vance. And you know

25:07

what you heard from Tim Walz? It was a

25:09

guy who was like a trust that lives down

25:11

the street from you. The coach that you had

25:14

in high school that you trusted the teacher that

25:16

you could confide in. And

25:18

just, he spoke in a way that

25:20

I think everyday Americans, you know, the

25:23

working families of America really understand. Are

25:26

you at all surprised that there were,

25:28

I think, a number of moments in

25:30

this debate where JD Vance was trying

25:32

to, I guess, burnish his credentials as

25:34

an empath and suggest that he kind

25:37

of, he cared about the struggles. He

25:39

was more bipartisan in posture than perhaps

25:41

you'd seen him in other media appearances.

25:43

You know, he tried to agree, at

25:45

least notionally with Governor Walz on some

25:48

things, even though obviously these two tickets

25:50

are diametrically opposed on substantive policy issues.

25:52

But I mean, do you

25:54

think that's gonna convince anybody? Because as you say,

25:56

he is a fairly slick order. He

25:58

was very rehearsed. but it was also a

26:01

slightly different posture than what he's taken before. Look,

26:04

he's a slick order for sure,

26:06

but you saw a

26:08

lot of inconsistencies and

26:10

his whole history is a list

26:12

of inconsistencies. The guy hasn't held a job for

26:14

more than two years. He

26:17

hasn't been able to keep the

26:19

same views on things. Remember, he

26:21

called Donald Trump America's Hitler. He

26:23

called Donald Trump a Nazi

26:25

just a few years ago. Now

26:27

he's his running mate and his

26:29

mini me, repeating all of the

26:31

lines of Donald Trump and defending

26:33

Donald Trump. So what is it

26:35

about him? It's that he wants

26:38

to achieve power. He wants to

26:40

get in positions, but he is

26:42

willing to, well, compromise himself and

26:44

any morals or ethos that

26:46

he may have ever had in his

26:48

life in order to get there. That's

26:50

been the problem for J.D. Vance and

26:52

that's why he's so unpopular with the

26:54

American public. Yeah, he has historically high

26:56

unpopularity that is certainly true. I was

26:59

struck by his, I mean,

27:01

just how candid he was in terms of

27:03

the problem Republicans understand themselves to have on

27:05

the issue of abortion. He at one point

27:08

said, we have got to do a much

27:10

better job on abortion and also said, not

27:12

all Americans agree with what I've said before,

27:14

which is the litany of strange and weird

27:16

proclamations on everything to what post-menopausal women should

27:18

be doing to the age at which women

27:21

should be having children. Do

27:23

you, I mean, first of all, that seems to reflect,

27:26

broad thinking inside the GOP that they

27:28

are hemorrhaging voters on this topic. What

27:32

did you think of his concession to

27:34

how badly the party's doing on the

27:36

topic? Well, I remember what he was

27:38

really saying. He was spanks basically saying,

27:41

well, trust me and trust Donald Trump,

27:43

right? That we'll do the right thing,

27:45

trust us. And you heard Tim Walz

27:47

say, we trust women. That's what Democrats

27:50

stand for. That's what Kamala Harris and

27:52

Tim Walz stand for. So I thought

27:54

that contrast was very, very clear. And

27:56

yeah, the Republican party has a lot

27:59

to answer for because the... deaths that

28:01

Tim Walz is talking about of women

28:03

who aren't able to get the kind

28:05

of reproductive services that they deserve because

28:07

doctors feel like they might go to

28:10

prison if they perform those services because

28:13

it's been criminalized in so many

28:15

states. I mean I'm in Illinois

28:17

where we've had to create an

28:19

oasis for people because every state

28:21

around us has criminalized or gotten

28:23

rid of abortion services. So people

28:25

are traveling hundreds of miles unfortunately

28:27

but at least they have a

28:29

place to go to protect themselves.

28:31

Tim Walz believes that the entire country

28:34

should be the haven for women. You

28:36

should be able to go to your

28:38

local hospital or your local doctor and

28:40

get the reproductive services you deserve whereas

28:42

Donald Trump and J.D. Vance are okay

28:44

with people dying in the parking lot.

28:46

Well right and J.D. Vance at one

28:48

point expresses effectively condolences for

28:50

Amber Thurman the woman in Georgia who died

28:53

because she had to leave that abortion desert.

28:55

Go get care in North Carolina and died

28:57

and effectively the back and forth of treatment

29:00

but then also on the same hand J.D. Vance

29:02

says but I think the abortion decision is best

29:04

left to the states. Well this is like everything

29:06

with the Republicans right their policies lead to people's

29:08

deaths and then they say oh thoughts and prayers

29:11

right this is the same thing about a ban on

29:13

assault weapons which is what we need in the United

29:15

States what Tim Walz and Kamala

29:18

Harris want for the people of the United

29:20

States and to protect our children right and

29:22

what do they say on the other side

29:24

oh thoughts and prayers when people die but

29:26

they do absolutely nothing to protect our children

29:28

and protect people on the streets who are

29:30

being gunned down by AR-15s. Governor J.B. Pritzker

29:32

of Illinois sir thank you for taking time

29:34

out of the mosh pit to come visit

29:36

me good luck in there. Good to see

29:38

you. Back to you Rachel. Thank

29:41

you Governor and thank you Alex we're looking at

29:44

live images here of Governor Tim Walz and his

29:46

wife Gwen getting pizza at I

29:48

think this is a place on 10th Avenue I

29:50

think I know this place. UC

29:53

Secret Service and other folks around but they're just

29:55

there he is paying for the pizza. We

29:57

think that both candidates are overnighting in New York.

30:00

before they head back out onto the campaign trail tomorrow.

30:02

Our friends, it's called Justina's,

30:04

I'm advised. Our colleague, Simone

30:07

Sanderson has joined us. Simone, what'd you think of the

30:09

debate? Well, Rachel,

30:11

look. I'm

30:14

in the Nicole Wallace Caucus tonight. Let

30:16

me just say this, that debates are

30:18

about performance and they are about policy.

30:22

And why this debate was

30:24

very important is that there are many Americans

30:26

out there, not just moderate Republicans, they're based

30:28

Democratic voters that are saying they

30:30

want to and need to hear more. Now, I

30:33

think it is very fair for people to want

30:35

to criticize those based Democratic voters and say, well,

30:37

what more do you need? You

30:39

can do that, but that is their lived reality. And so

30:41

if you were trying to win their votes, you have to

30:43

meet them where they are. There

30:45

were so many niceties on that debate stage

30:47

tonight. I am just kind of like, well,

30:50

if you agree so much with JD Vizz,

30:52

why should they vote for you? I

30:55

fully believe that Governor Wallace went out there tonight

30:57

and did what was practice in debate prep, did

30:59

what the strategy was that the

31:01

team put together. That was not the

31:04

Governor Wallace that we, that I had seen out on

31:06

the campaign trail. That's not the Governor Wallace that I

31:08

had seen during the Veep Stakes, right? That was not

31:10

the JD Vance that I know to be true. I

31:12

mean, goodness, JD Vance was on that stage, he was

31:14

sorry about Amber Thurman. He was sorry about a lot

31:17

of stuff. We

31:19

get things wrong, but do you give it the

31:21

policy? And then I just, you

31:23

know, that's not the Margaret and nor that I

31:25

know. Margaret don't do that on Sunday morning. So

31:28

I just think that I know that there's

31:30

so many people out there that want normal,

31:32

they want normalcy. They just want, you know,

31:34

just be able to just disagree with someone.

31:38

You said a lot of things I agree with. This

31:41

is not a normal election. JD

31:43

Vance is actually not Paul Ryan.

31:46

And Donald Trump sure as heck is not

31:48

Mitt Romney, okay? And what happened

31:50

on that debate stage tonight is was not

31:52

enough contrast, was not clear enough for people

31:54

sitting at home or frankly, who will probably

31:56

consume this through the clips in their local

31:58

news or here on. MSNBC or on

32:01

social media to distinguish and make a

32:03

difference. Sure, Governor Pritzker was absolutely correct.

32:05

He did a lot of lies and

32:07

people know he was correct about one

32:09

part. J.D. Vance is a lot of

32:11

lying. But everyone doesn't know that J.D.

32:13

Vance is lying. There is somewhere right

32:15

now, a Republican TikTok creator putting

32:17

up a little clip talking about how, yes, Donald

32:20

Trump saved Obamacare. There

32:23

was no one there to count. I mean,

32:25

some of this, so I think that Governor

32:27

Walz got better on the counter block and

32:29

tackling in the second half, but still. But

32:33

on that Obamacare point, so Walz came in and said,

32:35

Donald Trump was trying to get rid of Obamacare and

32:37

he would have, and he signed onto this lawsuit, lost

32:39

it, and then had a bill to get rid of

32:41

it and would have got there had it not been

32:43

for John McCain. You don't think that was a good

32:45

enough rebuttal? J.D. Vance said, well,

32:47

Donald Trump strengthened and saved Obamacare. That's what he

32:49

came back and said. Right. It's

32:51

the audacity. I agree with

32:53

you that we're in year nine and

32:55

no one knows how to cover the

32:58

audacity. The audacity is that someone should

33:00

have said, stop it. Stop. Stop. Are

33:02

you f'ing kidding me? And they should have dropped

33:04

that F bomb, right? I mean, they should have

33:06

just, this is a debate. This may be the

33:08

only chance people have to see the difference. And

33:11

instead, I'm going to go back to my toothpicks.

33:13

J.D. Vance just put one little toothpick on top

33:15

of the other and said, and I'm for this

33:17

and I'm for this. And I'm so sorry those

33:19

women died. They died because of Donald Trump. One

33:22

man had a litmus test for the people he put

33:24

on the Supreme Court and he put not one toothpick

33:27

three on because they passed a litmus test that they

33:29

would overturn Roe. And that's why Amber died. That's

33:32

why that little boy doesn't have a mom.

33:34

And nobody made that reality come to life.

33:36

Because I think if you, even if you

33:38

didn't get the contrast you were looking for,

33:40

neither did you get any, any,

33:42

you know, wake up and smell the smelling

33:44

salts, you know, sort of lulled into normalcy.

33:46

There was, let me ask you about one

33:48

other, one other subject matter and

33:50

how it went on gun

33:53

violence in schools. They both said the same thing

33:55

about how it's very sad and it breaks your

33:57

heart. And then, um,

34:00

What J.D. Vance said was, listen,

34:03

I think the reason that we have gun violence in

34:05

schools, I'm paraphrasing, is because of the southern border. And

34:08

what we need is stronger windows. He

34:10

literally used the phrase, stronger windows and

34:12

doors that lock better. And

34:16

Governor Walz came in and said, I

34:19

think sometimes the problem is the guns.

34:22

And I say that as a gun owner, somebody

34:24

used to keep a shotgun in my truck so

34:26

I could go pheasant hunting after football practice. I'm

34:28

not here to confiscate everybody's guns, but we've got

34:30

problems with gun policy in this country and that's

34:32

what it is. It's not

34:34

stronger windows is the solution to gun violence

34:36

in the schools. Now, would

34:39

that have made for a better social media

34:41

day tomorrow? Had he said it in a

34:43

punchier way? Is part of the problem here

34:45

style? I feel like on substance- The base

34:47

of part policy, part performance. You have to

34:49

hit the performance. I'm sorry, when Joe Biden

34:51

didn't hit his performance, the people were very

34:53

ready to talk about how Joe Biden didn't

34:55

hit the performance. I think though,

34:58

this was a function of a strategy that they

35:00

devised for Governor Walz. I think this was the

35:02

strategy. And frankly, when you devise, when you are

35:04

going into a debate with someone, the worst thing

35:06

you can do is ask them to be somebody

35:08

else. As you try to build them up and

35:10

try to have them, just put

35:12

on a little something extra that you wouldn't

35:14

usually do. Governor Walz should have

35:17

been able to go on there and be Tim Walz. And

35:19

I think we saw a little more Tim Walz towards

35:21

the mid, later into the debate, but in the beginning, it

35:24

was very clear that he was, doing

35:26

what they had agreed upon the strategy and debate

35:29

prep. You know, I don't think it

35:31

was a good strategy. I disagree

35:33

with you on, I do agree

35:35

that he was following the strategy he was given by

35:37

the campaign, but I don't think

35:39

that this was a debate that was designed

35:41

to move people off of their team if

35:43

they were already on it. This debate is

35:45

not gonna move very many people. There is

35:47

a very small, narrow group of people who

35:49

have not made up their minds about Donald

35:51

Trump and Kamala Harris. That small, narrow group

35:53

of people, when you poll them, you talk

35:55

to them, they seem to want, number one,

35:58

more stuff. substance, they keep asking, I need

36:00

to know more, I need to know more,

36:02

I need to know more details. Tim

36:04

Walz was very detailed and he spoke the

36:06

way a governor speaks about really specific issues

36:08

like gun violence, like healthcare. He was substantive

36:11

and knowledgeable. So if you're that person who

36:13

the thing that's keeping you on the fence

36:15

is you need more details, he gave you

36:17

more details. Number two,

36:19

I don't think that small, narrow group

36:21

of people wanted to see a fistfight.

36:24

And so I think that the people who want the

36:26

fistfight are the base of the Democratic Party. That's

36:29

want to see someone get up

36:31

there and give a knuckle sandwich to Donald

36:33

Trump. That's what they want. But that is

36:35

not the group of people who need this

36:37

debate. Most people are already voting, already know

36:40

what they want. I think the reason that

36:42

Tim Walz was effective in the way he

36:44

did it, he wasn't angry, he was disappointed.

36:46

And that's actually in some ways stronger if

36:48

I'm that undecided and it is a strange

36:50

group of people, these people who can't decide

36:52

between arsenic and pancakes. You

36:56

know, it's like it's very hard to say

36:58

these two things are equal, but there are

37:00

those people. And when I've heard them talk,

37:02

they say things like, I don't know, I

37:05

don't understand Vice President Harris's policies on X,

37:07

Y, and Z. Tim Walz gave you that

37:09

specificity that I think is going to get

37:11

those people to feel more comfortable. And his

37:13

job was to make people feel comfortable. And

37:15

last thing I'll say is to provide a

37:17

permission structure for people who aren't core Democrats

37:19

to come over. And that

37:21

lack of meanness, the kindness, the fact that he says,

37:23

you know, I want to agree with this guy. I

37:26

think that we agree on a lot of things. I

37:28

hate to say it. A lot undecided. That's

37:30

what they want to hear. I just want to note

37:33

that there are a lot of base Democratic voters who

37:35

are not undecided about whether they want to vote for

37:37

Kamala Harris or Donald Trump. They're undecided if they are

37:39

going to vote. And

37:41

I just think if people listen to people,

37:44

listen to some of the voters that they're saying

37:46

that we, Melissa Murray and I talked to, I

37:48

know there were a lot of people who were

37:50

very good. A lot of consternation about some of

37:52

the young women we spoke to in the nail

37:54

shop and our black women in America wrote 20,

37:56

24 special. But

37:59

that young woman. said she didn't think her vote mattered,

38:01

she lives in North Carolina. And

38:03

you can walk her down about her

38:05

position, or you can meet her where

38:08

she is and let her know why her vote matters.

38:10

And what I have heard from a lot of people across the

38:12

country, not strategists, not political strategists,

38:15

just regular people that aren't as tuned

38:17

in, they feel like the campaign

38:19

is doing a lot right now to talk

38:21

to Republican voters, those people in the middle,

38:23

and that they don't think that they need

38:25

to persuade pieces of the base, and they

38:27

do. To me, this feels very much so

38:30

similar right now to 2016, more than it

38:32

does to 2020. That woman

38:34

in the nail shop, had you been able to

38:36

remote control Tim Walz like a drone tonight,

38:39

what would you have had him say or

38:41

do that might have moved her? I think

38:43

the housing conversation, the second part of the

38:45

housing conversation, I think Governor Walz was very,

38:47

I think housing is very important to people

38:49

across the country. When they say affordability and

38:51

the economy, that's what they're talking about. Talking

38:54

about housing, they're talking about rent, they're talking

38:56

about grocery prices. But I thought that housing

38:58

conversation was clear. I thought, I think abortion

39:00

was something that she herself said was important

39:02

to her and the healthcare piece. I think

39:04

sometimes when we get into policy,

39:06

healthcare conversation, it gets a little theoretical.

39:10

But I just think that how you deliver

39:12

the message does matter. And yes, you can

39:14

say it, and you could say, oh, you

39:16

said it, but how

39:18

you say it matters. Yeah. First

39:21

of all, let me ask, do we need to go to Jacob right now? Is

39:23

he ready for us? Okay, he is,

39:26

good. Jacob Soboroff is

39:28

in Oakland University

39:30

in Rochester, Michigan. We spoke with

39:32

him as he was setting up with a bunch of

39:34

students who are going to be watching the debate there at a watch party.

39:37

And he's convinced them to stick around even though the

39:39

debate ended, which itself is a Herculean effort. Jacob,

39:42

take it away. How'd it go? Rachel, look at all the people.

39:44

You guys, thank you very much for sticking around. I really appreciate

39:46

you guys sticking around. The green flags and the red flags, they

39:48

did the whole thing and it was amazing. And

39:58

they don't have them any longer. And

40:00

I don't know if this is gonna surprise

40:02

you. These are not undecided voters necessarily. These

40:04

are voters who could very well tip the

40:07

outcome of the election come

40:09

election day because they live in one of

40:11

the most consequential counties in all of Michigan,

40:13

Oakland County. It was 100,000, as I told

40:15

you before the debate, 100,000

40:18

votes swing from Trump to Biden in the 2020

40:20

election. McCone County,

40:22

one of the neighboring counties is also a very

40:24

important swing county here. Let's just start with a

40:26

show of hands. Did anybody come into this debate

40:29

and leave feeling differently than when they came in

40:31

in terms of candidate? Raise your hand if you

40:34

changed your opinion of the

40:36

candidates because of this debate. Oh,

40:38

really, one. Come on down, dude. Come on down.

40:41

Come on down. Come on down. Come

40:43

on down. Very surprising. What's

40:46

your name? Henry. Henry, what's going

40:48

on? Okay, so you came in feeling what? I

40:51

felt like JD Vance would have been a lot worse. I

40:54

think he's very awkward. His

40:56

other public appearances have been very awkward. I'm

40:58

thinking back to the scenario in the ice

41:01

cream shop where he just made it so

41:03

awkward for the employee and

41:05

they don't want to be on camera. Might have been the

41:07

donut, too, right? Yeah, I just thought, well,

41:09

why can't he just be normal like the rest

41:11

of us? And that's how you felt coming out

41:14

of here. I felt he did a lot better.

41:16

He spoke, I feel the way JD

41:18

Vance works is he works very well when he has a lot

41:20

of preparation. This is

41:22

the debate, he knows about it weeks in advance. So

41:25

he's able to repair. He felt like he prepared better here. I

41:27

think he prepared very well. So one of the

41:29

things, will you do me a favor? These are for you. Thank you very much. Thank

41:32

you. One of the things guys that I thought got the

41:34

strongest reaction here was Jimenez was talking about guns at the

41:36

beginning of the debate. And one

41:38

of the strongest reactions here I thought

41:40

was interesting was Rachel, what you were just talking about

41:43

when JD Vance said, one of the ways ultimately

41:45

that we can stop gun violence in this country is

41:48

by having better locks on

41:50

our doors. Did anybody

41:52

react? You're laughing back

41:54

here. No, you. What's

41:57

your name? Nora. What'd you think when

41:59

you heard JD Vance? talk about that. Jimena was

42:01

talking about how because of what happened at one

42:03

of your neighboring schools here, it's an issue that

42:05

rings close to home. I thought it

42:07

was ridiculous. I mean, the issue

42:10

is guns. The issue is not better locks

42:12

on doors. Reproductive

42:14

freedom is also something that got a big

42:16

reaction in this room. And I saw a

42:18

lot of green flags go up when Governor

42:21

Walz was talking about how he

42:24

wants to protect a woman's right to make her

42:26

own choices. I see you reacting strongly here. Really

42:28

ultimately, guys, what this is about is enthusiasm and

42:30

whether or not in this state that had the

42:32

highest youth voter turnout in the 2022 midterm

42:34

elections, whether or not folks like this are going

42:36

to be compelled to come out. These guys are

42:38

compelled to stay here until 11 o'clock, 11,

42:41

excuse me, 27 on a school night. You

42:44

know, you heard that answer. What did you think? Um,

42:48

sorry, could you repeat that? Reproductive freedom. What

42:50

did you think when you heard Governor

42:52

Walz say that he thought it was a

42:54

woman's right to make

42:56

her own choices? I completely agree with

42:58

that. Like, I feel like that should

43:00

be considered common sense almost, but

43:03

it isn't. It's become such a heated debate

43:05

for what feels like should be

43:07

a no brainer. And he just kind of voiced

43:09

that. The other one was immigration. I thought, God,

43:11

and you guys correct me if you feel like

43:13

I'm misstating everything here. But on immigration, they're

43:16

number one, there was a loud laugh in this room when

43:18

those mics got shut off. And

43:21

that was, of course, around the issue of

43:24

the Haitians that are in Springfield, Ohio

43:26

under the temporary protected status. J.D.

43:29

Vance was saying Senator Vance was saying that they were

43:31

there illegally. Of course, that wasn't true. The moderators pointed

43:33

out and they cut the mic. But

43:35

I also thought you guys in the room

43:37

responded strongly to the pushback on

43:40

the point that President

43:42

Biden and Vice President Harris put forward

43:44

one of the strongest and most conservative,

43:47

actually, Republican bills in

43:49

recent history. And Donald Trump killed that

43:51

bill. Did anybody did that? Did

43:54

that ring true? You're up here. Let me just come up

43:56

here with you real quick. You're not in your

43:58

head. Yes. Hi, what's your name? Why

44:00

was that something James that resonated

44:02

with you? It is true. Congress

44:05

has power for these immigration policies

44:07

and it just keeps getting pushed back

44:10

between presidency to presidency, which Congress does

44:12

have power in these situations. It's

44:15

really just forming a demonization of immigrants, which

44:17

is such an issue. We

44:19

see a lot of violence against immigrant communities.

44:21

These are not illegal people. They

44:24

come here undocumented for whatever reason

44:26

there is. And it's just causing

44:28

more harm than anything. And we just

44:30

need to push towards true policy rather than

44:32

all these talk points. I appreciate it, you

44:34

guys. And I guess maybe the final

44:36

thing that I just wanted to ask, we

44:39

were talking, Marcus, about this constant criticism about

44:41

the vice president not being able...about the vice

44:43

president being in office for these last...he's already

44:45

upset about it. The vice president being in

44:47

office for all these years and not being

44:50

able to make the change was the allegation

44:52

from JD Vance. You said to me, I've

44:54

been to high school civics class. Why

44:56

did you say that? Because if anybody

44:59

took high school civics class, they'd know what

45:01

the vice president can do and what the

45:03

vice president can do. I want to make

45:05

a quick point. Neither candidate

45:07

on that stage talked about what executive

45:09

action they're going to take on day

45:11

one to do what they want, nor

45:13

were they asked, because they know that

45:15

they can't. That's not how the

45:17

vice presidency works. You don't get to do what you

45:20

want. You do what the president delegates you to do.

45:22

So that... That one day, Marcus, is going to

45:25

be all of our teachers in civics class, guys. I

45:27

want to thank you all very much for

45:29

being here. And Rachel, just reiterate

45:31

how important that these voters are, the enthusiasm

45:33

that is here. You can really feel it.

45:37

And it's exciting to be here with all of you guys.

45:39

We appreciate it very much. And I know they

45:41

do too back in the studio. Rachel, back to you. Fate of

45:43

the Nation is in your hands from Madam

45:45

President Ximena and to all of them. Very,

45:48

very thankful. Very thankful to you,

45:50

Jacob, for being there with them. It's inspiring to see them. Thanks,

45:53

Rachel. All right. Thanks, guys.

45:57

Jen Psaki has joined us. Jen, what is your

45:59

reaction to the debate? We have lots of heated

46:01

and interesting discussion, lots of different points of view

46:03

here. First of all, I want to get Marcus

46:05

an internship. Yes, exactly. He knows

46:07

better how civics works and how government works than

46:10

most people. Look, I

46:12

felt that if you're sitting at home and

46:14

you were watching and you were not fact

46:16

checking and you weren't familiar with what JD

46:18

Vance had said previously or what Donald Trump

46:20

stood for, he seemed at

46:22

many moments to be reasonable. And

46:25

that was clearly a change in tone. And I know

46:27

you all were talking about the strategic shift there. That

46:30

was interesting to watch. Watching Tim

46:32

Malls, what I thought about was when he

46:34

emerged onto the scene, we all probably interviewed

46:36

him five times during Veep Stakes, he

46:39

would propel himself single-handedly into Veep

46:41

Stakes, right? He became the running

46:43

mate because they're chemistry, but also

46:46

because he was so effective at

46:48

connecting people authentically and

46:51

organically on television. He's

46:53

been absent. I think that's a huge mistake

46:57

to hold him back and not put him

46:59

out there. Meaning he hasn't been on the

47:01

media for a while. He hasn't been out

47:03

in the media for a while. He's been

47:05

absent. I do think that's a missed opportunity.

47:07

But tonight I felt like he was spending

47:09

a lot of time in the first half

47:11

or two thirds, proving he read the briefing

47:13

materials and I was missing the magic and

47:15

the organic spontaneity of Tim Malls. I know

47:17

you already all talked about the January 6th

47:20

moment, which I thought was great, and the

47:22

moment on healthcare also great. I loved it

47:24

when he quoted the Bible and made it

47:26

about morality on immigration. But

47:28

coming out of it, I hope that they

47:30

free Tim Malls and put him out there

47:33

and let him be rusty at times and

47:35

make mistakes and hug football players and cry

47:37

and be funny sometimes. That's the

47:39

magic. That's why he's on the ticket. Do you

47:42

feel like there was a transition from over the

47:44

course of the debate? I feel like after that

47:46

first break when he came back is when he

47:48

landed all his punches. Yes, he

47:50

was clearly nervous. Who wouldn't be? It's the biggest moment

47:52

you've ever been on in your life on that stage

47:55

he was on tonight. There was a shift I felt,

47:57

maybe about 45, 50 minutes in. around

48:00

abortion, he was quite strong. And I was thinking to myself, and

48:02

we've talked about this, we are now on

48:04

a stage in 2024 where men are

48:07

very comfortable running for office and talking

48:09

in detail about abortion rights and sepsis

48:11

and everything that can happen. And that

48:13

is in itself is progress. On

48:15

gun violence, I thought he was stronger and obviously

48:18

the moment on January 6th, it took him a

48:20

while to get there. My point is, I think

48:22

he's an enormous asset to the campaign. I think

48:24

people really connect with him. That's

48:26

why he's on the ticket. And he should

48:28

be out there more because when he gets

48:30

into a groove, it's sometimes messy, sometimes says

48:32

funny things that are slightly off. That's okay.

48:34

He connects with people because that's who he

48:36

is. And I hope we see more of

48:38

that. That very difficult exchange at the end

48:41

about January 6th, about Vance being

48:43

unable or unwilling to answer about who won the

48:45

2020 election is going

48:47

to be one that sticks. That

48:49

is going to be an important part of

48:51

the legacy of this debate, but also a

48:53

quicker earlier moment in the debate where J.D.

48:56

Vance told a lie that

48:58

is really, really going to stick to

49:00

him, that he told very bluntly, very

49:03

cleanly, and very much 180 degrees wrong.

49:06

And the antidote to it, the fact check on

49:09

it, is himself on tape. That

49:11

one is really, really going to stick to him. We'll

49:13

have that for you right on the other side of

49:15

this break. We'll be right back. Stay with us here

49:17

on MSNBC. When

49:21

Donald Trump said, I've got a

49:23

concept of a plan, it cracked me up as a

49:25

fourth grade teacher because my kids would have never given

49:27

me that. But what Senator Vance

49:30

just explained might be worse than a concept

49:32

because what he explained is pre-Obamacare. And I'll

49:34

make this as simple as possible because I

49:36

have done this for a long time. What

49:39

they're saying is, if you're

49:41

healthy, why should you be paying more?

49:44

So what they're going to do is let insurance

49:46

companies pick who they insure. MSNBC's

49:50

Lawrence O'Donnell. When I worked for

49:53

Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, I learned

49:55

about commitment. Building New York's

49:57

newest train station was Senator Moynihan's idea.

50:00

It took 30 years and never giving

50:02

up. When we register to vote, we

50:05

make a lifetime commitment to democracy, a

50:07

commitment to vote for all levels of

50:09

government working together to

50:11

build a better America. The Last

50:14

Word with Lawrence O'Donnell, weeknights

50:16

at 10 p.m. Eastern on MSNBC.

50:20

Hi, I'm Stacey Abrams, voting

50:23

rights advocate, author, admitted

50:25

nerd, and now host of the

50:27

brand new Cricut podcast, Assembly Required

50:29

with Stacey Abrams. Whether it's reforming

50:31

the electoral college, solving America's loneliness

50:33

epidemic, or tackling the future of

50:36

Hollywood, I'm breaking it all down

50:38

to answer, how do we get

50:40

here, and what can we

50:42

do to get good done? Are you in?

50:45

Join me for Assembly Required with Stacey

50:47

Abrams. Comments are available wherever

50:49

you get your podcasts. What's

50:51

causing the rise in book banning? On my podcast,

50:54

Velshi Band Book Club, I speak with authors of

50:56

banned books to try and find out. Season

50:59

two of Velshi Band Book Club. Listen

51:01

now. Senator

51:07

about that, he mentioned, I think referring to

51:09

a national ban. In the past, you have

51:11

supported a federal ban on

51:14

abortion after 15 weeks. In

51:16

fact, you said if someone can't

51:18

support legislation like that, quote, you

51:21

are making the United States the

51:23

most barbaric pro-abortion regime anywhere in

51:25

the entire world. My question

51:27

is, why have you changed your position? Well,

51:30

Nora, first of all, I never supported a

51:32

national ban. I did during when I was

51:34

running for Senate in 2022 talk about setting

51:36

some minimum national standard. Okay, okay,

51:39

okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, but

51:41

wait, I never

51:43

supported a national ban. I talked

51:45

about setting some minimum national standard.

51:47

I never supported a national ban.

51:51

Do we have tape of

51:53

reality here? I

51:56

certainly would like abortion to be illegal nationally.

52:00

So if you're on tape saying,

52:02

I certainly would like abortion to

52:04

be illegal nationally, that

52:06

means you supported a national ban on

52:09

abortion. J.D. Vance,

52:11

an incredibly slick, facile

52:14

talker. I mean, he's a professional talking head. This

52:16

is what he's been doing his whole adult life.

52:19

But on that one, on an issue that

52:21

important to lie on something that bluntly, I

52:23

feel like Ari, that's going to follow him

52:25

around a little bit. Yeah, it's a huge

52:27

deal. It might have been the most significant

52:29

substantive gaffe. We were having debate earlier on

52:31

the table about style. Yeah. This

52:34

was a substantive, huge error. He

52:36

lied. He lied because his past

52:38

position is too close to the

52:40

real Donald Trump, Project 2025 position.

52:43

The GOP platform also talks this up.

52:45

It doesn't use the national ban language.

52:48

But this is the person,

52:51

Donald Trump, who put the people on the court

52:53

to overturn Roe. They all pledged to do it.

52:56

They're not just looking for some

52:58

interstate quilt program, which is

53:00

what they've currently fallen back on as a,

53:02

I would again, I say this respectfully, but

53:04

a nonsensical or illogical defense of their position.

53:06

They are looking long term and it's all

53:08

out there for a national ban, which means

53:10

wherever you live in the country, California,

53:13

New York, wherever, that would be their

53:15

policy. And they're giving away the game

53:18

everywhere in the country that Republicans are

53:20

in control. Right now, there is an

53:22

abortion ban. Yes. And so if you

53:25

want abortion to be banned, vote for

53:27

Republicans. Everywhere they get power, they do

53:29

it. And this is J.D. Vance and

53:32

Donald Trump saying they want power nationally.

53:34

And Harris, here is J.D. Vance bluntly

53:36

lying about his overt statement that he

53:39

wants it illegal nationwide. And just briefly,

53:41

that's why it's so important that he

53:43

also admitted under questioning, wait, I thought

53:46

we agreed on no fact

53:48

checking. That's important if lying about your

53:50

positions from abortion policy to what happened

53:52

on January 6 is central to your

53:54

campaign and how you plan to hopefully

53:56

win over votes is by lying to

53:59

people. On a lighter note, it

54:01

reminded me a little bit of the famous Saturday Night

54:03

Live impression of the Gerald Ford debate when he said,

54:05

I thought there would be no math. And

54:07

the joke was the president has to deal

54:09

with these things. I thought that was a

54:11

real giveaway from Vans. I

54:13

think there's lies and there's misrepresenting things,

54:16

right? So J.D. Vance showed up tonight

54:18

to sort of put a smoother sheen

54:20

on Trumpism, which is interesting because it's

54:22

the opposite of who he is on

54:24

the campaign trail. On the campaign trail,

54:26

he is the most aggressive, the most

54:29

offensive. But his goal was to sort

54:31

of take you back to this idea

54:33

that pre-COVID life was great. We had

54:35

this great economy. And people like to

54:37

tend to go back and believe that

54:39

forgetting that Donald Trump had the same

54:41

economy, slightly worse than President Obama did.

54:44

But he really got up there

54:46

and lied or stretched things when

54:48

he would immediately link migrants, illegal

54:50

migrants, which they're not in Springfield,

54:52

Ohio, to the lack of affordable

54:54

housing, which simply isn't true. He

54:56

all but said Donald Trump protected

54:58

Obamacare. And in those cases, you're watching

55:00

Tim All's going, come on, like, are you going to

55:02

get in there? Are you going

55:04

to get in there? And it wasn't

55:06

until J.D. Vance simply wouldn't

55:09

say that Joe Biden won the

55:11

election free and fair. And

55:13

that's kind of what gave the game away.

55:15

They're like, yes, he was slick. He gave a

55:17

great excuse to lots of people who don't want

55:19

to publicly say that they're voting for Trump. They're

55:22

like, he's okay. Right then and there, you're like, oh,

55:24

everything that you said before this, I'm not so sure

55:27

of. We all know who won the election.

55:29

You know, we played a little bit from that portion at the end

55:31

of the debate, the discussion about January 6th, the discussion

55:33

about whether or not we respect election results. We

55:35

played a little bit of it before, but there's one other

55:37

piece of it that we haven't played yet that and we're all

55:40

talking about it. So let's just hear it. I

55:43

see a candidate out there who

55:45

refused. And now again, and this I'm pretty

55:48

shocked by this. He lost the election. When

55:51

Mike Pence made that decision

55:54

to certify that election, that's why

55:56

Mike Pence isn't on this stage. What

55:59

I'm concerned about is where is

56:01

the firewall with Donald Trump?

56:04

Where is the firewall if he knows

56:07

he could do anything including

56:10

taking an election and

56:12

his vice president's not going to stand to it? That's

56:14

what we're asking you America. Will you

56:16

stand up? Will you keep your oath

56:18

of office even if the

56:20

president doesn't? So America I think you've

56:22

got a really clear choice on this

56:24

election of who's going to honor that

56:26

democracy and who's going to honor Donald

56:28

Trump. Stuff got real right

56:31

there up until then they were trying to

56:33

be more cordial. I heard you all the

56:35

analysis tonight you know it seemed more normal

56:37

right there that's when normal stops

56:39

right and you say where's the firewall because it's

56:41

not necessarily going to be the speaker of the

56:43

house and it's definitely not going to be this

56:45

guy if he's the VP. And let's explain the

56:47

firewall point and maybe Wall should have explained it

56:49

in the moment but he's saying listen we

56:52

all saw that Donald Trump lost the

56:54

election claimed that he didn't lose and

56:57

then unleashed hell in this country to

56:59

try to hold on to power even

57:01

though we lost. The firewall was Mike

57:03

Pence. Mike Pence not only

57:06

respecting the Constitution but being willing to stand

57:08

up to Donald Trump and not do what

57:10

Donald Trump was ordering him to do. He

57:12

was the firewall. JD Vance will not be

57:14

a firewall and that's why he got the

57:16

job. Nor will Mike Johnson. And he could

57:18

have said that. I mean JD Vance is

57:20

on television basically saying he would help him

57:23

with another fake electors plan. Yes that may

57:25

or may not be why he is the

57:27

running mate currently it probably is a big

57:29

part of it. The other piece

57:31

we haven't played this but I wrote

57:33

this down with like exclamation points where

57:35

JD Vance said he'll have my prayers

57:37

best wishes and my help. That's what

57:39

JD Vance said about Kamala Harris and

57:42

Tim Walz if they won. And

57:44

that was part of the Earth

57:46

too as you like to say

57:49

the alternative universe whatever you may

57:51

call it. You're like buddy your

57:54

campaign is currently planning to suppress

57:56

votes to challenge votes to use

57:58

lawsuits to make it to challenge

58:01

the outcome. I mean, that was,

58:04

I mean, a jarring moment. Tim Walz had

58:06

some good moments, but there were some missed

58:08

moments too. And I don't think we can

58:10

emphasize this enough. It's called a bloodless

58:13

coup for a reason. There's

58:15

also a bloody coup. They did try both. But let's

58:17

remember, we've reported on it, and Rachel, you've warned about

58:19

it. I think everyone at this table has reported on

58:21

it. The original move

58:24

before they resorted to storming the

58:26

Capitol was the bloodless coup of

58:28

trying to get the states or

58:31

the alternate electors to

58:33

override the congressional certification without storming

58:35

the Capitol. And as Vance put

58:37

it, throw it to the

58:40

Congress for a big old fight. That

58:42

fight involves overturning the will

58:44

of the voters. And so when he says that

58:46

publicly and he showed, again, I thought

58:49

there were some moments, I do think for the record,

58:53

J.D. Vance was able to pretend that he's more

58:56

rational or logical-seeming in

58:58

these 90 minutes than he is day to

59:00

day and whether that works for him politically

59:02

is a point. But there were those revelations.

59:05

And so when he's caught there, unable to

59:07

acknowledge the winner of the last election, who's

59:09

the current president, which is a giveaway that

59:11

you're still working within the

59:13

big lie and double down on what

59:15

he said, which is we want to

59:17

throw it to the Congress. Everything else

59:20

is B.S. That's where I think our

59:22

friend Nicole Walls was calling for the

59:24

F-bombs. And I'll give you one. It

59:26

was frivolous. It was a

59:28

frivolous claim as far as

59:30

I can go. A different F-bomb. On

59:32

MSNBC, it's as far as we're going

59:35

to go here, family television. But that

59:37

was important because, yeah, you want to

59:39

stand up and go, wait a minute.

59:41

And I thought, you know, basically,

59:44

Walls was able to do some of it. The moderators,

59:46

I thought, did a decent job, but they

59:48

didn't do a ton in that moment to be like, this

59:50

is nuts. The person standing up

59:52

here is promising another. And again, I

59:55

say bloodless. He did not. I'm not

59:57

saying he advocated a Proud Boys insurrection,

59:59

but he did advocate the end of American

1:00:01

democracy. But that's the whole enchilada, right? Discussing

1:00:04

health care, the economy, all that

1:00:06

stuff is nonsense. Are

1:00:08

you going to accept the outcome

1:00:10

of the election results? Are you

1:00:12

participating in politics, or is

1:00:14

this just before the war? Yes, yes. That's

1:00:16

the question here, right? Are you going to

1:00:19

seize power, or are you going

1:00:21

to accept that people vote on who's in

1:00:23

power? Because those are the only two choices.

1:00:26

And to not be able to get a clear

1:00:28

answer on that is, as you say, the whole

1:00:30

enchilada. On

1:00:32

the point, actually, this is not on

1:00:34

this point at all. But this is something that Joy and

1:00:36

I want to show you. Because

1:00:39

I know that you and I

1:00:41

are old enough and have similar

1:00:44

enough internet tastes that you remember

1:00:46

dramatic chipmunk. Do

1:00:48

you remember dramatic chipmunk? It turns out it was dramatic

1:00:51

prairie dog. Do we have dramatic chipmunk? No,

1:00:55

no, no, not the honey badger. Do we have it? I

1:00:58

thought it was a chipmunk, but it's a prairie dog. Intriguing.

1:01:01

Yeah, hold on. Where is it? Come

1:01:05

on. See, does it look like a... Yeah, I know

1:01:07

it. I think I know exactly what you're talking about.

1:01:09

Yes. OK. Yes, I do. Yes, I do. Remember

1:01:12

it. OK. So dramatic chipmunk

1:01:14

was a thing. And the

1:01:16

moment... I think, do we have this actual thought

1:01:18

of it, where the chipmunk kind of turns and

1:01:20

faces the camera and raises the eye like that?

1:01:22

Because there was a number of

1:01:24

things... There was a number of incidents

1:01:26

in the vice presidential debate tonight where

1:01:29

J.D. Vance was looking at Tim Walz,

1:01:31

looking at him from the side, and

1:01:33

then turned without moving his head and

1:01:35

raised the eyebrows of the camera like that,

1:01:37

basically to make eye contact with the audience at

1:01:39

home, like, do you believe this guy? Anyway,

1:01:43

I just wanted to say, Joy, I... You know what?

1:01:45

I made that face when J.D.

1:01:48

Vance said that Donald Trump

1:01:50

peacefully turned over

1:01:52

power... On January 20th. On

1:01:54

January 20th. Yeah. How about he talked

1:01:56

about all the bipartisan ways he went.

1:01:58

Saving a Obamacare. during those four

1:02:01

years. And to me, I struggle to find

1:02:03

this big group of undecided voters in America.

1:02:05

I think there's a lot of people who

1:02:07

aren't necessarily saying who they're going to vote

1:02:09

for and what JD Vance did. I can

1:02:11

tell you on my phone tonight, it was

1:02:13

filled with people who love to say, see,

1:02:15

he's totally normal, don't you think? He put

1:02:17

on the show that people who were already

1:02:20

voting for Trump needed and wanted to feel

1:02:22

okay about it. Let's go to Alex Wagner,

1:02:24

who is in the spin room at the

1:02:26

site of the debate with our friend Claire

1:02:28

McCaskill. I

1:02:30

just want you to know that Claire McCaskill risked

1:02:32

life and limb to get into this room, almost

1:02:35

got bounced from the debate hall.

1:02:37

I thought they were going to tase me trying

1:02:39

to get into the spin room. The

1:02:42

Secret Service was a little out of control

1:02:44

here tonight. Like most Americans, we blame Donald

1:02:46

Trump Jr. for the problems. Yes. But

1:02:49

I do want to call your, he's

1:02:51

sitting right next to us, so I won't go

1:02:53

on at length about that. But Secret Service protection,

1:02:55

much more hardcore at this debate than the last

1:02:57

one. Claire, there is a

1:02:59

new sort of CBS, I will call

1:03:02

it a snap hole after this debate,

1:03:04

and the people who are asked, who

1:03:06

won the VP debate? 42%

1:03:08

of them say JD Vance won it, 41%

1:03:10

say Governor Walz won it, 17% say it's a tie. Does

1:03:14

anything about that surprise you? No, I think

1:03:16

the debate, first of all, JD

1:03:19

Vance tried to do one thing and he

1:03:21

focused on it. He tried to be Tim

1:03:23

Walz. He tried to be

1:03:25

the nice guy. And he was very

1:03:27

smooth. And the

1:03:30

other thing about JD Vance is that he's

1:03:32

a better liar than Donald Trump. He

1:03:36

wraps it up in prettier ribbon with

1:03:38

a bigger bow and

1:03:40

does it with such a straight face

1:03:42

and does it so effortlessly. Trump,

1:03:45

lots of times when he lies, you kind

1:03:47

of can tell, no, this

1:03:49

guy's a really good liar. And he

1:03:52

obviously lied. I mean, I had that foul on my

1:03:54

chair when he said on the

1:03:56

ACA because I was there. I was in

1:03:58

the Senate chamber when- McCain

1:04:00

walked in and gave the thumbs down.

1:04:02

I know what Donald Trump tried to do to

1:04:05

the ACA. And the idea that

1:04:07

he would try to pretend that somehow he was

1:04:09

protecting it. The other thing that struck me about

1:04:11

the debate is I think most Americans, and I

1:04:13

know you guys have probably talked about this already,

1:04:16

but most Americans don't see the

1:04:18

vice president as the policymaker. And

1:04:21

I don't remember any time during the debate

1:04:23

that they talked about the Pence years when

1:04:26

Trump was president. The Pence administration. The

1:04:28

Pence administration. And the Pence did all

1:04:30

these things. And

1:04:33

so I don't think most Americans

1:04:35

really believe the vice president has

1:04:37

the power to pass

1:04:39

legislation and implement policy unless

1:04:42

she is working on behalf of

1:04:44

the president she's serving. So

1:04:47

I don't think that is, I think that's

1:04:49

one of the reasons probably the debate polling

1:04:51

is so close. And

1:04:54

I think the debate probably in the long

1:04:56

run, even though Trump, the answer was a

1:04:58

really good liar. And even though he tried

1:05:01

to be really nice, I think

1:05:03

it's probably a wash. I

1:05:05

talked to Jason Miller, the senior Trump campaign

1:05:07

advisor, after the debate. And I brought up

1:05:09

the January 6 exchange

1:05:11

at the end of the debate. And I said, you know, is

1:05:14

that a problem for your campaign? And he said,

1:05:16

if that's all Democrats have, then

1:05:18

I'm not worried. What do you

1:05:21

think? I think they should

1:05:23

be worried. I think it was so

1:05:25

stark. It was at the end of the debate. It was

1:05:27

a dramatic moment. It was unbelievable

1:05:29

that he would not say that Trump

1:05:31

lost the election. He would not say

1:05:33

that they would not try to do

1:05:35

the same play again. So I do

1:05:39

think that was the most damning moment, as

1:05:41

some of our colleagues said earlier. That's kind

1:05:43

of when it all fell apart, I think,

1:05:46

for Vance at the end. And you realize,

1:05:48

OK, maybe this all was just an act. And he

1:05:50

really is just a Donald Trump

1:05:52

wannabe. I am disturbed by the phenomenon that

1:05:54

you have called out, which is this attempt

1:05:57

to revise history in real time. It's something

1:05:59

our own. Steve Bannon at MSNBC

1:06:01

has written a book about, but the idea

1:06:03

that you can basically rewrite the facts minutes

1:06:06

after they unfolded, whether or not it's Donald

1:06:08

Trump saying he had nothing to do with

1:06:10

the killing of the Langford Bipartisan Immigration Bill,

1:06:12

whether it's J.D. Vance saying he never supported

1:06:14

a national abortion ban. And the question is,

1:06:16

is the sort of universe

1:06:19

of information so bivarcated into the

1:06:21

truth and the not-truth, Earth-1 and

1:06:23

Earth-2, that all of those

1:06:25

assertions on the Vance Trump ticket don't

1:06:28

actually matter, that the lies don't matter? Or do

1:06:30

you think the truth actually eventually breaks through? I

1:06:32

don't know, but I do know this. There

1:06:35

is something deeply ironic that they had

1:06:37

a debate question about

1:06:40

Tim Walz misspeaking about when he was in

1:06:42

China 35 years ago, but

1:06:45

Donald Trump said some outrageous lies

1:06:47

today and every day makes outrageous

1:06:49

lies. And there was not one

1:06:51

question about being a vice presidential

1:06:53

candidate to a man who says

1:06:56

daily, massive things. I mean,

1:06:58

just what he said about Kim and

1:07:01

President Biden in the hurricane

1:07:03

disaster just yesterday. The

1:07:06

idea that they're making a big deal out of a

1:07:09

misstatement of Walz when Donald

1:07:11

Trump is a walking line machine.

1:07:13

Literally every minute, every

1:07:15

hour on the hour. Unbelievable. Senator

1:07:18

Claire McCaskill, take her to the club because she's going

1:07:20

to get you in. Over to you, Rachel. What

1:07:24

would we have done had you actually got

1:07:26

tased though, Claire? Honestly, I mean,

1:07:28

we would have had it would have been a story. It

1:07:31

would have been a story. Alex,

1:07:33

would you please accompany me? What

1:07:37

got me mad was I found out they let

1:07:40

Hannity in and they were about to let the

1:07:42

dog puppet in and they hadn't

1:07:44

let me in. I'm going, come on,

1:07:46

guys. The dog puppet was advocating, the

1:07:48

Daily Show dog puppet was advocating for

1:07:50

the Senator to let out. Well,

1:07:53

thank you. The dog puppet actually said Claire

1:07:55

should go in before the dog puppet. I

1:07:57

said thank you for that. what

1:08:00

if there's one thing that can bring Americans together,

1:08:02

I mean I really feel like the dog puppet

1:08:04

can show us the way we're glad you're OK

1:08:06

say thank you to the dog for us. All

1:08:09

right we're going to take a very quick

1:08:11

break. Our MSNBC coverage of tonight's vice presidential

1:08:13

debate continues right after this day with us.

1:08:30

Backman and Dejan news and

1:08:32

all MSNBC original podcasts are

1:08:34

available ad free and with

1:08:37

bonus content, including how to

1:08:39

win 2024

1:08:41

prosecuting Donald Trump. Why is this happening?

1:08:43

Velshe Band book club and more right

1:08:46

now with MSNBC premium. You can listen

1:08:48

to the latest episode of how to

1:08:50

win 2024 available

1:08:53

exclusively to subscribers. Presidential historian

1:08:55

Michael Beshloss takes a deep

1:08:57

dive into some of the

1:09:00

most notable moments in past

1:09:02

vice presidential debates and how

1:09:04

they move the needle in

1:09:06

past elections subscribe to MSNBC

1:09:08

premium on Apple podcasts.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features