Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Subscribe to MSNBC Premium on
0:02
Apple Podcasts to get new
0:04
episodes of Morning Joe and
0:06
the Rachel Maddow Show ad-free.
0:09
Plus ad-free listening to all
0:11
of Rachel Maddow's original series,
0:13
Ultra, Backman and Dejan News.
0:15
And all MSNBC original podcasts
0:17
are available ad-free and with
0:20
bonus content including How to
0:22
Win 2024, prosecuting
0:25
Donald Trump, Why is this happening,
0:27
Velshi Band Book Club and more.
0:30
Right now with MSNBC Premium you can listen
0:32
to the latest episode of How to Win
0:34
2024. Available
0:36
exclusively to subscribers, presidential historian
0:39
Michael Beschloss takes a deep
0:41
dive into some of the
0:43
most notable moments in past
0:45
vice presidential debates and how
0:47
they've moved the needle in
0:49
past elections. Subscribe to MSNBC
0:52
Premium on Apple Podcasts. The
0:56
vice presidential candidates debate wraps
0:58
up at CBS
1:00
News headquarters in New York
1:02
City. You see the candidates
1:05
there being joined by their wives, Usha
1:07
Vance and Gwen Walls. A
1:09
cordial debate between these two men.
1:12
I wouldn't describe them as evenly matched
1:14
because they are so different. So
1:17
different in style and so different on
1:19
substance. Very interested to
1:22
hear from the spin room to hear from all of my colleagues
1:24
here to get to all of the analysis that we're going to
1:26
get to. I think the big
1:28
picture take away from this is that
1:30
one of these candidates is much slicker
1:32
than the other is a much more
1:34
practiced kind of professional debate style
1:37
speaker and the other candidate
1:39
one. There
1:41
was one bad moment for Tim Walls in this
1:43
debate where he got mixed up and embarrassed and
1:45
answering a question about exactly what month he had
1:47
been in China in relation to the Tiananmen Square protest. But
1:51
then on guns, on
1:53
January 6th, on Obamacare, on
1:56
the economy, on blaming everything
1:58
on the border. back
2:00
again on health care, on abortion, on
2:04
every issue on substance.
2:08
J.D. Vance was very polished and very
2:11
slick, and Tim Walz
2:14
beat him on all the substantive points. At least
2:16
that was my take on it. I
2:18
do think that there was one very
2:21
blunt, very easily disprovable lie
2:23
on a very important issue
2:26
that is going to be real trouble for J.D.
2:28
Vance coming out of this, which was him saying
2:30
I never supported a national ban on abortion. J.D.
2:33
Vance is bluntly on the record and
2:36
on tape saying I
2:38
want abortion to be illegal
2:41
nationwide. His actual quote
2:43
was, I certainly would like abortion
2:45
to be illegal nationally. Saying I
2:47
never supported a national abortion ban
2:49
when that's out there is something
2:51
you're never going to shake in
2:54
your campaign, particularly when so much
2:56
of the country is mobilized on this issue
2:58
of reproductive rights, the first presidential election
3:01
after the fall of Roe versus Wade. Nicole.
3:05
Why am I always first? Because you lost the
3:07
short straw. So I think
3:09
that J.D. Vance spent the night sort of
3:11
building an intricate and beautiful Ford out of
3:13
toothpicks. And it was perfect. And
3:15
at the end, he sneezed on it,
3:17
the whole thing fell apart, and he had to
3:19
walk out of that room over the broken toothpicks.
3:22
I think that God bless the people
3:24
who watched the whole thing and stayed locked in on it. I
3:26
checked in with about 20 people all to do this
3:28
and watch this for a living. And they were kind
3:30
of in and out of some parts of it. But
3:34
no matter how you watch this, if you
3:36
cannot say what happened in 2020, and
3:40
the only reason you're there is because what
3:42
actually happened in 2020 is that Donald Trump
3:44
sent his supporters to hang Mike Pence. Just
3:46
ask them. Yeah. Then you
3:48
lose. And I think that, you know,
3:51
Governor Walts had a lot of
3:53
great moments. Tim Walz built that
3:55
perfect artifice. I mean, J.D.
3:57
Vance built this perfect artifice. He was speaking.
3:59
thinking as though he were running to be
4:02
Mitt Romney's wife. I mean, he spoke tonight.
4:04
It was a performance that was kind
4:07
of amazing and totally disconnected from the
4:09
person who he's running
4:11
with, Donald Trump. But still unable to
4:13
say that Trump lost the election in
4:15
2020. And in that moment, unable to
4:18
say it. In the moment, I think
4:20
everything that he did for 88 minutes
4:22
was lost and wiped out by that
4:25
one inability to tell the truth in
4:27
front of a huge television audience. Well,
4:29
that moment was the moment of the
4:31
night. I mean, it's like, wait, why
4:33
is he here? Oh,
4:36
right. The Mike Pence thing. Right? So
4:38
that was the moment of the night. J.D. Vance is
4:40
very good at this, right? I mean, this is what he's been
4:42
doing since he was in college in the
4:44
Yale Law. Like talking to libs and being kind of
4:46
like, well, I sort of agree with you here, but
4:48
here's the other part of this. Like, and he did
4:50
that all perfectly fine. There were,
4:53
I thought, walls on the substance, particularly on
4:55
healthcare, was very, very strong on healthcare on
4:57
the sort of basic of like the tax cuts and who
5:00
you're fighting for. Again, these are meat
5:02
and potato core messages. The two moments that I think
5:04
kind of broke me a little bit, I don't know
5:06
about the median information level
5:08
of the viewer, the
5:10
level of gaslighting to say that Donald
5:14
Trump saved the ACA. Yes,
5:16
he saved Obamacare. Like, we've
5:18
madly gone up on national
5:20
television and said that Donald
5:22
Trump had saved Obamacare. In
5:24
a bipartisan way. In
5:26
a bipartisan way. And despite the fact, trying to
5:28
reveal it multiple times, and Waltz had a very
5:30
good fact check on that. And then I
5:33
thought nothing was going to top that, but what
5:36
topped it was he handed power over
5:38
peacefully on January 20th. I said it
5:40
twice. Yes. When the coup failed
5:42
and the cops brains had all been bashed
5:45
in and there were actual dead bodies and
5:47
blood on the Capitol, 14 days
5:50
later, we did manage to actually do it.
5:52
And he didn't show up for the transfer
5:54
of power, by the way. He said it's
5:56
really rich for Democratic leaders to say Trump
5:58
is a unique threat to democracy. when
6:00
he peacefully gave over power on January the
6:03
20th. And everybody's like, what is
6:05
that alternate universe in which that happened I would
6:07
like to visit? It seems nice and much less
6:09
violent. Joy. Yeah, I mean,
6:11
at that moment when Tim Wal said, you
6:13
really can't answer that question. You really can't say
6:15
that Donald Trump lost the election. You can't do
6:17
that. That was the moment of the night. But
6:19
I was just going through and catalog, you guys
6:22
have mentioned some of them. He said there were
6:24
25 million undocumented immigrants in the country. It's probably
6:26
more like 15, 16. He
6:28
said that he repeatedly
6:30
lied about Springfield again and did it so
6:32
insistently that he had to have his mic
6:35
muted because he kept trying to jump in
6:37
and continue to lie about these people. He
6:39
said they were brought in through something called
6:41
the CBP1 app. And
6:43
that is an app that immigrants can use to
6:45
come in and get a certain kind of visa.
6:47
That was launched in 2020 under,
6:50
drum roll, Donald Trump. He says
6:53
that he never supported a national
6:55
abortion ban. I have here a
6:57
printout that is already circulating all
6:59
over social media. This is
7:02
from the campaign website of J.D. Vance when
7:07
he ran for the United States Senate. It is
7:09
headlined End Abortion.
7:12
He says he's 100% pro-life, believes abortion has
7:14
turned his society into a place where we
7:16
see children's and inconvenience, on and on and
7:18
on. You also gave one of the quotes,
7:20
I would certainly like to see abortion illegal
7:22
nationally. He also said he was sympathetic to
7:24
the view that a national ban would be
7:26
necessary to stop women from traveling across states
7:29
to obtain an abortion. So he's in favor
7:31
of a sort of fugitive slave act to
7:34
stop abortion. So he said that as well.
7:36
He blamed undocumented immigrants for everything from rising
7:38
house prices, rising food prices, inflation, maybe ghosts
7:41
and bad weather. I mean, he was blaming
7:43
undocumented immigrants for every single thing. I think
7:45
Tim Walz was really skillful in knocking those
7:47
things down individually because he was speaking as
7:50
a governor and could speak from his own
7:52
experience. He did a great job talking about
7:54
housing costs and how those actually worked. The
7:56
bipartisan way to save healthcare was absolutely absurd.
7:59
He said, He said, most of our solar
8:01
panels are coming from China. It's literally the
8:03
opposite. Google the Department of Education that says,
8:06
80% of our solar panels come from,
8:08
drum roll, the United States. Trump peacefully gave
8:11
over power on January 20, kinda
8:13
skipped January 6th when he was trying to overthrow
8:15
the government. He couldn't answer the question, did Trump
8:17
lose the election? A smooth
8:19
lie is still alive. J.D.
8:21
Vance is incredibly smooth, but
8:24
he said, number one, nothing memorable. There's
8:27
nothing clippable in what he said. They
8:29
were just all smooth bland lies. He
8:31
got out done by
8:33
Tim Walz, who may be awkward. He
8:35
may got hit, took him a while to get
8:37
warmed up, but he won the debate because he
8:39
actually had substance, he was relatable, and he didn't
8:42
go in there to slay J.D. Vance.
8:45
He went in there to show himself,
8:47
and he showed himself to be bipartisan.
8:49
He showed himself to be reasonable. He
8:51
showed himself to be practical. He acted
8:54
as a governor. And a
8:56
lot of people are complaining that he didn't
8:58
knock J.D. Vance out, and that he wasn't
9:00
rhetorically cruel, but that was not his job.
9:02
It was obvious that his job was to
9:04
sell Kamala Harris as president.
9:06
He did that very well. He won
9:08
the debate. I wrote a note to
9:10
myself that he was not on offense
9:12
against Vance in the first half of
9:14
the debate, and then he came back
9:16
after that break, right? After the break,
9:18
it was like, just destroyed him on
9:21
healthcare, and then the January 6th, January
9:23
20th thing, I mean, I
9:25
scratched out my own note. True, he was
9:27
not on offense against Vance for the first
9:29
half of the debate, and then he came
9:31
back and more than made up for it.
9:33
Yeah, right. You know, he will be remembered
9:35
for that final exchange about, you know, did
9:38
Trump lose the election, and he doesn't
9:40
answer. His technique is to not answer.
9:42
It makes him, by the way, the
9:44
very first vice presidential candidate in history
9:46
who doesn't know who won the election.
9:49
That's his place to be. That's his
9:51
place to be. Where did you
9:53
see this job list? Are
9:55
you Republicans already in office? It
9:57
came at the end of a long
9:59
list. of questions that he simply didn't
10:02
answer. He said words but didn't answer.
10:04
For example, the first one he didn't
10:06
answer. Donald Trump says,
10:08
climate change is a hoax. Do you
10:10
agree? That's a one word answer, yes
10:13
or no. He didn't answer
10:15
that. He just kept talking. And
10:18
he was then asked, will you
10:20
separate parents from
10:23
children, even if the children are
10:25
US citizens? No answer. Did
10:27
not answer that question. Donald
10:30
Trump's budget plan will cost $5
10:33
trillion added to the national
10:36
debt. What's your solution to that? No answer.
10:41
Will you monitor pregnancy? Got an answer, he
10:43
said no. Actually said no to that. Finally,
10:46
there was an answer. He
10:49
was then asked, where are
10:51
you going to seize the federal
10:54
lands to
10:56
build on? And he gave no answer.
10:58
Now, that's a really important question. If
11:01
you're trying to build anything in America, we really
11:03
want to know where it is. And a lot
11:05
of people don't want it to be in their
11:07
backyard. And then, of course, Walls followed up on
11:10
that by saying, so when you seize the federal
11:12
land for the housing, is that also the federal
11:14
land you're seizing for the drilling? Are we having
11:16
people live in the world, Darks? Are they all
11:19
going to be together? No answer. Yeah, no answer.
11:23
And then we get to the final big
11:25
no answer, which is going to be on
11:27
a loop now of did he lose the
11:29
election and the inability to answer that. And
11:31
so just on that
11:33
very simple debate concept
11:36
of, here's the question and you answer
11:38
it, he lost spectacularly on any scorecard
11:40
when you just give him a zero
11:42
for every single one that he didn't
11:45
answer. Can I say something about the
11:47
moderators? Because we spend
11:49
a lot of time on it before the debate. And they
11:52
defied whatever. I mean, they did a
11:54
great job. And
11:57
they also used their mic muting
11:59
power. And I actually think if you're
12:02
a woman, that might be the worst moment
12:04
J.D. Vance had, because he was going to
12:06
mansplain right over that mute button. And
12:09
again, I don't pretend to know how everyone
12:12
will react to this. I think that a
12:14
lot of women in positions
12:16
of authority that should command respect just
12:18
by virtue of that dynamic will see
12:21
themselves and some do the disrespect of
12:23
them and talked over. I
12:25
mean, there was a moment like that with
12:27
the vice presidential in the Harris-Pence debate where
12:30
she said, I'm speaking. There is
12:32
this real belief that what he had to say
12:34
was more important than the debate rules and the
12:36
moderator. And to Joy's
12:38
point, the substance of that moment
12:40
was when he was lying about
12:43
immigrants in Springfield, Ohio again. And
12:45
Tim Walz had called him out on it. And then
12:48
he was trying to say, no, no, no, no, I'm
12:50
not lying. Let me tell you why I'm calling them
12:52
illegal immigrants, even though they are not
12:54
illegal immigrants. Let me mansplain the law to
12:56
you. And the moderators in
12:58
that point not only muted his mic, but
13:00
said, thank you for explaining the law. It's
13:03
not what we're asking you about. But that's
13:05
when he also complained about being fact checked.
13:07
Saying the rules said you cannot fact check
13:09
me. That's one of the things that's in
13:12
the video that we'll be hearing a lot of. Norah
13:14
O'Donnell did a fact check that
13:16
was indirect at the end of the
13:18
climate change discussion and the discussion ended.
13:21
And she just said directly the overwhelming
13:23
consensus among scientists is climate change
13:25
is warming at an unprecedented rate. She
13:27
just said it, not in a direct
13:30
confrontation to J.D. Vance. So I saw
13:32
that and I thought, OK, there's that
13:34
method. But then when it was a
13:37
direct fact check to J.D. Vance,
13:39
he did complain that CBS was violating
13:41
its own rule. This podcast is supported
13:43
by Planned Parenthood Federation of America. Planned
13:46
Parenthood Federation of America exists so all
13:48
people can get access to the sexual
13:50
and reproductive care and education they
13:52
need. Planned Parenthood organizations advocate for health
13:55
equity and policies that allow people the
13:57
freedom to control their own bodies. More
14:01
than 2 million patients a year
14:03
rely on Planned Parenthood Health Center
14:05
services, like STI testing and treatment,
14:07
birth control, gender-affirming care, abortion, cancer
14:09
screenings, and more. Reproductive
14:12
health care and rights are under attack from public
14:14
officials who are out of step with the will
14:16
of the vast majority of Americans. The
14:18
constitutional right to abortion has been stolen,
14:21
and politicians in 47 states have introduced bills
14:23
that would block people from
14:25
getting the sexual and reproductive care they need.
14:28
Planned Parenthood knows that equitable access to health
14:30
care, including safe, legal abortion,
14:32
is a human right. Right
14:34
now, Planned Parenthood needs your help to protect
14:36
access to health care. Donate
14:39
today by visiting plannedparenthood.org/protect.
14:43
MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell. When I worked for
14:46
Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, I learned about
14:48
commitment. Building New York's newest train station
14:50
was Senator Moynihan's idea. It took 30
14:52
years, and never giving up. When
14:57
we register to vote, we make a lifetime commitment
14:59
to democracy, a commitment to vote
15:01
for all levels of government, working together to
15:04
build a better America. The
15:07
Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell,
15:09
weeknights at 10pm Eastern on
15:11
MSNBC. The
15:13
World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim is a brand
15:15
new podcast from Sky News. With
15:18
me, Sky News' lead world news presenter, Yalda
15:20
Hakim. And me, Richard Engel, chief
15:22
foreign correspondent for NBC News. Every
15:24
week, we'll be reporting from the front line
15:27
of the world's trouble spots and asking the
15:29
big questions to the world's most important and
15:31
influential people. Join us to help you
15:33
understand what is happening in the world today and why
15:35
it matters to you. So that's The World with Richard
15:38
Engel and Yalda Hakim. Launching October
15:40
9th. Listen every Wednesday, wherever you get
15:42
your podcasts. In
15:44
case you're just joining us, it's the top of the
15:46
hour. Let me say we're super grateful to have you
15:48
watching our coverage of the vice presidential debate here on
15:50
MSNBC. It was a debate that
15:52
I think started essentially as kind of a slow burn.
15:55
Like I thought, oh, this is going to be cordial,
15:57
which is good. I'm not sure what's
15:59
happening here. on the substance, the pace of it
16:02
was much slower at the beginning, and then
16:04
about midpoint, it really took off. And then we
16:06
had what I think was a, what
16:09
I thought was almost a knockout on
16:11
healthcare. I thought Walz basically knocked
16:13
out a Vance on healthcare. First of
16:15
all, he wobbled really badly on guns. We can talk about
16:17
that. He almost knocked him out on healthcare. And then when
16:19
we got to January 6th, he was out cold. There
16:22
was something about the debate too, just in sort of
16:24
tone and format to your point about the slow burn.
16:26
Like I remember that Chaney Lieberman debate in 2000, they
16:28
were sitting next to each other. It was very collegial,
16:30
very avuncular, very we agree on stuff. And there was
16:33
some of that vibe you saw a little bit of
16:35
like, oh, this is the JD Vance that made lots
16:37
of liberal friends at Yale. This is the Tim Walz
16:39
that won a very Republican district in really
16:41
difficult times, including 2010 when basically every other
16:43
Democrat got kicked out of the house. You
16:45
saw an ability to be able to like,
16:48
okay, I can talk to people who don't
16:50
agree with me. Right?
16:52
But the thing that really sort of like
16:55
cut it was to get back to that democracy
16:57
question in the end, which it
17:00
was interesting. Walz almost apologizes for
17:02
it where he says like, we're agreeing on a lot
17:04
of stuff and there's a lot of bipartisan. This is a
17:06
thing I can't go with you on. And I just
17:08
thought it was very human. You could tell you
17:11
could see it in his face because you
17:13
can hear when someone's throat is a
17:15
little close. He doesn't like fighting and
17:17
arguing. He doesn't like delivering the blow. It's not
17:19
who he is. He had to kind of steal
17:21
himself. He almost apologized for it. I'm so shocked. I'm
17:24
so shocked. I'm kind of bummed out by this
17:26
dude that you would say that. But it was, I
17:28
found that part all the more effective because of what
17:31
you were saying about that sort of like slow burn
17:33
and sort of collegiality and pretty wonky on stuff like
17:35
housing, which I thought was actually a good exchange and
17:37
sort of interesting. That part, it
17:39
was like, right, we can all
17:41
walk together and talk about these policy things up
17:44
to a point. But there is a point
17:46
at which we can't. And
17:48
I, Tim Walz, am saying this is really the point.
17:50
Let me just actually break the wall here a second.
17:52
Ask the control room. Do we have SOT-19? The
17:56
piece of sound that you're getting, that you're referring to, we're
17:58
going to try to turn around quicker than. It
18:00
takes us a second after the end of the debate to get
18:02
all these pieces of sound turns around. But
18:04
I think that one we've pulled. I just want people to hear exactly
18:07
what you're talking about here. Talk
18:10
about the state of democracy, the
18:12
top issue for Americans after the
18:14
economy and inflation. After
18:16
the 2020 election, President Trump's
18:19
campaign and others filed 62
18:21
lawsuits contesting the results. Judges,
18:24
including those appointed by President
18:26
Trump and other Republican presidents,
18:28
looked at the evidence and
18:30
said there was no widespread
18:32
fraud. The governors
18:34
of every state in the
18:36
nation, Republicans and Democrats, certified
18:38
the 2020 election
18:41
results and sent a legal slate
18:43
of electors to Congress for January
18:45
6th. Senator
18:47
Vance, you have said you would not
18:50
have certified the last presidential election and
18:52
would have asked the states to submit
18:54
alternative electors. That has
18:56
been called unconstitutional and illegal. Would
18:59
you again seek to challenge this year's
19:02
election results, even if every governor certifies
19:04
the results? I'll give you two minutes.
19:06
Well, Laura, first of all, I think
19:09
that we're focused on the future. I
19:14
just think for everyone tonight and
19:16
I'm going to thank Senator
19:18
Vance. I think this is the
19:20
conversation they want to hear. And I
19:23
think there's a lot of agreement. This is one that
19:25
we are miles apart on. This was
19:27
a threat to our democracy in a way that we
19:29
had not seen. And it manifested
19:31
itself because of Donald Trump's inability to say he
19:33
is still saying he didn't lose the election. I
19:35
would just ask that. Did he lose the 2020
19:38
election? Tim, I'm focused
19:40
on the future. Did Kamala Harris censor
19:42
Americans from speaking their mind in the
19:44
wake of the 2020 covid situation? That
19:48
is a damning that is a damning non-answer. The
19:52
verbal rejoinder there, half as powerful as the facial
19:54
expression in that moment. Yeah,
20:00
and that was a moment that was
20:02
coming all night. And I don't know
20:04
if Tim Walz deliberately held it to
20:06
that and waited for it to get
20:08
to that point. But it really was
20:10
the moment that kind of reshuffled
20:13
everything, as Nicole says, everything that you
20:15
thought you had heard in the last
20:17
88 minutes or so changed
20:19
in a way that was very, very, very
20:22
clear. That there's one person
20:24
here who is actually capable of
20:26
dealing with reality. And there's this
20:28
other person who will say anything,
20:30
whatever is necessary to say to
20:32
get through, to thread the
20:34
Trump needle to get where he has
20:37
to be on whatever the
20:39
question is. There was another great moment
20:41
where he was asked a
20:43
very simple direct question, how do you
20:45
protect pre-existing conditions in whatever the Trump
20:47
health care plan will be? And
20:50
his answer was, we already have a
20:52
law for that. That's correct. That is
20:55
Obamacare. That was the very first
20:58
law in American history that actually protected
21:00
people with pre-existing conditions and allows them
21:02
to get health insurance. And the great
21:04
thing about the question, how
21:06
do you protect pre-existing conditions? If you're just
21:08
talking to someone where there was
21:11
no health care plan in place in the
21:13
government, if that was your first
21:15
question, the answer to it actually has to
21:17
become an entire health
21:20
care system. It's
21:22
an answer that builds the entire Obamacare plan
21:24
from that one question, even though that is
21:26
listed as just one thing that it
21:28
does. In order to do that, you have
21:31
to do every other thing that Obamacare does,
21:33
including the subsidies and all that stuff.
21:35
And so that is one
21:37
of those policy questions that shows you
21:39
the utter emptiness of the man. In
21:41
policy terms, it's kind of identical to
21:43
the emptiness of his answer on who
21:45
won the election. And
21:48
for Wallace to be able to say in that
21:50
moment, I know a lot about health care. I've
21:52
worked on this a lot. It's really important in
21:54
my state. Let me just make this simple. What
21:56
you're talking about is the system we had before
21:58
Obamacare, which is why we needed Obamacare. And for
22:00
him to just cut through it all and say,
22:03
this policy that you think you're inventing here and
22:05
sounding all amazing about, that's what we had. And
22:07
that was the disaster that we needed this huge
22:09
reform to fix, that the country is very grateful
22:11
now, which you want to get rid of, which
22:13
Trump tried to get rid of, which only John
22:15
McCain saved us from him being able to get
22:18
rid of it. He just cut through it for
22:20
people who don't maybe have
22:22
the interest in the policy
22:24
in a specifics, but he
22:26
made it so clear in terms of what the stakes are there. It was sort
22:28
of perfectly done in his
22:30
very kind of folksy way.
22:32
Let's go to the spin room now
22:34
to where Illinois governor JB Pritzker is
22:37
standing by with our Alex Wagner. Alex.
22:39
Thanks Rachel. Governor, thank you for wading
22:41
through the scrum to join me here.
22:43
Let's talk about what happened on that
22:46
debate stage. Starting, I think probably with
22:48
Governor Walz's strongest answer, which unfortunately came
22:50
at the very end, but I'm optimistic
22:52
that people followed this to the 90
22:55
minutes. Talking about January 6th, what happened
22:57
at the Capitol and also the certification
22:59
of the 2020 election. He
23:02
wouldn't say who won the election. He
23:04
said, I want to talk about the
23:06
future. He basically suggested that Trump's interest
23:08
in all the lawsuits that he filed
23:10
or allies of his filed was about
23:12
an open conversation about the election. I
23:15
mean, I think Governor Walz gave the
23:17
line of the night when he said, Mike
23:19
Pence isn't on the stage. Where
23:21
is the firewall now? This
23:23
person suggesting that,
23:26
you know, J.D. Vance was not going
23:28
to do the thing that Mike Pence
23:30
did, but importantly, which is stand up
23:32
to Donald Trump as he tries to
23:34
subvert democracy. What did you think
23:36
about that moment? And how much do you think that
23:38
now is in the forefront of voters mind setting into
23:40
the last stretch of the election? This
23:43
election is about the future of our democracy.
23:45
And so that's why that question was so
23:47
important, even if it came at the very
23:49
end. Yeah. Because what you heard was J.D.
23:52
Vance not willing to say that Donald
23:54
Trump won the 2020 election. I mean,
23:56
how can you actually think that that
23:59
person? should be vice president of the
24:01
United States if he can't even admit
24:03
what is true, because, well,
24:05
he's the mini me for Donald Trump who
24:07
can't live up to the idea or can't,
24:10
you know, tell the truth about the 2020
24:12
election. So I think that we're,
24:14
you know, this was
24:16
the perfect frame for the rest
24:18
of the debate. If you look
24:20
back at the rest, what you'll
24:22
see is a slick debater and
24:24
JD Vance who consistently could not
24:26
answer a question. He just kept
24:28
shifting, shifting, shifting. And we
24:30
all know, for example, let's talk about
24:32
healthcare. We all know that Donald Trump
24:34
and the Republicans tried to, well,
24:37
pull back and end Obamacare.
24:39
Right? And over and
24:41
over again, they tried to do that. And yet that's
24:43
not what you heard from JD Vance. It was Tim
24:46
Walz who had to call him out on it and
24:48
make sure that he, you know, was
24:50
answering for the idea that, you know, they
24:52
want to take away the coverage for people
24:54
with preexisting conditions. They want to take away
24:56
coverage for, you know, your 26 year
24:59
olds and under who are covered
25:01
by the ACA. That over and over
25:03
you heard lies and kind of slick
25:05
answers from JD Vance. And you know
25:07
what you heard from Tim Walz? It was a
25:09
guy who was like a trust that lives down
25:11
the street from you. The coach that you had
25:14
in high school that you trusted the teacher that
25:16
you could confide in. And
25:18
just, he spoke in a way that
25:20
I think everyday Americans, you know, the
25:23
working families of America really understand. Are
25:26
you at all surprised that there were,
25:28
I think, a number of moments in
25:30
this debate where JD Vance was trying
25:32
to, I guess, burnish his credentials as
25:34
an empath and suggest that he kind
25:37
of, he cared about the struggles. He
25:39
was more bipartisan in posture than perhaps
25:41
you'd seen him in other media appearances.
25:43
You know, he tried to agree, at
25:45
least notionally with Governor Walz on some
25:48
things, even though obviously these two tickets
25:50
are diametrically opposed on substantive policy issues.
25:52
But I mean, do you
25:54
think that's gonna convince anybody? Because as you say,
25:56
he is a fairly slick order. He
25:58
was very rehearsed. but it was also a
26:01
slightly different posture than what he's taken before. Look,
26:04
he's a slick order for sure,
26:06
but you saw a
26:08
lot of inconsistencies and
26:10
his whole history is a list
26:12
of inconsistencies. The guy hasn't held a job for
26:14
more than two years. He
26:17
hasn't been able to keep the
26:19
same views on things. Remember, he
26:21
called Donald Trump America's Hitler. He
26:23
called Donald Trump a Nazi
26:25
just a few years ago. Now
26:27
he's his running mate and his
26:29
mini me, repeating all of the
26:31
lines of Donald Trump and defending
26:33
Donald Trump. So what is it
26:35
about him? It's that he wants
26:38
to achieve power. He wants to
26:40
get in positions, but he is
26:42
willing to, well, compromise himself and
26:44
any morals or ethos that
26:46
he may have ever had in his
26:48
life in order to get there. That's
26:50
been the problem for J.D. Vance and
26:52
that's why he's so unpopular with the
26:54
American public. Yeah, he has historically high
26:56
unpopularity that is certainly true. I was
26:59
struck by his, I mean,
27:01
just how candid he was in terms of
27:03
the problem Republicans understand themselves to have on
27:05
the issue of abortion. He at one point
27:08
said, we have got to do a much
27:10
better job on abortion and also said, not
27:12
all Americans agree with what I've said before,
27:14
which is the litany of strange and weird
27:16
proclamations on everything to what post-menopausal women should
27:18
be doing to the age at which women
27:21
should be having children. Do
27:23
you, I mean, first of all, that seems to reflect,
27:26
broad thinking inside the GOP that they
27:28
are hemorrhaging voters on this topic. What
27:32
did you think of his concession to
27:34
how badly the party's doing on the
27:36
topic? Well, I remember what he was
27:38
really saying. He was spanks basically saying,
27:41
well, trust me and trust Donald Trump,
27:43
right? That we'll do the right thing,
27:45
trust us. And you heard Tim Walz
27:47
say, we trust women. That's what Democrats
27:50
stand for. That's what Kamala Harris and
27:52
Tim Walz stand for. So I thought
27:54
that contrast was very, very clear. And
27:56
yeah, the Republican party has a lot
27:59
to answer for because the... deaths that
28:01
Tim Walz is talking about of women
28:03
who aren't able to get the kind
28:05
of reproductive services that they deserve because
28:07
doctors feel like they might go to
28:10
prison if they perform those services because
28:13
it's been criminalized in so many
28:15
states. I mean I'm in Illinois
28:17
where we've had to create an
28:19
oasis for people because every state
28:21
around us has criminalized or gotten
28:23
rid of abortion services. So people
28:25
are traveling hundreds of miles unfortunately
28:27
but at least they have a
28:29
place to go to protect themselves.
28:31
Tim Walz believes that the entire country
28:34
should be the haven for women. You
28:36
should be able to go to your
28:38
local hospital or your local doctor and
28:40
get the reproductive services you deserve whereas
28:42
Donald Trump and J.D. Vance are okay
28:44
with people dying in the parking lot.
28:46
Well right and J.D. Vance at one
28:48
point expresses effectively condolences for
28:50
Amber Thurman the woman in Georgia who died
28:53
because she had to leave that abortion desert.
28:55
Go get care in North Carolina and died
28:57
and effectively the back and forth of treatment
29:00
but then also on the same hand J.D. Vance
29:02
says but I think the abortion decision is best
29:04
left to the states. Well this is like everything
29:06
with the Republicans right their policies lead to people's
29:08
deaths and then they say oh thoughts and prayers
29:11
right this is the same thing about a ban on
29:13
assault weapons which is what we need in the United
29:15
States what Tim Walz and Kamala
29:18
Harris want for the people of the United
29:20
States and to protect our children right and
29:22
what do they say on the other side
29:24
oh thoughts and prayers when people die but
29:26
they do absolutely nothing to protect our children
29:28
and protect people on the streets who are
29:30
being gunned down by AR-15s. Governor J.B. Pritzker
29:32
of Illinois sir thank you for taking time
29:34
out of the mosh pit to come visit
29:36
me good luck in there. Good to see
29:38
you. Back to you Rachel. Thank
29:41
you Governor and thank you Alex we're looking at
29:44
live images here of Governor Tim Walz and his
29:46
wife Gwen getting pizza at I
29:48
think this is a place on 10th Avenue I
29:50
think I know this place. UC
29:53
Secret Service and other folks around but they're just
29:55
there he is paying for the pizza. We
29:57
think that both candidates are overnighting in New York.
30:00
before they head back out onto the campaign trail tomorrow.
30:02
Our friends, it's called Justina's,
30:04
I'm advised. Our colleague, Simone
30:07
Sanderson has joined us. Simone, what'd you think of the
30:09
debate? Well, Rachel,
30:11
look. I'm
30:14
in the Nicole Wallace Caucus tonight. Let
30:16
me just say this, that debates are
30:18
about performance and they are about policy.
30:22
And why this debate was
30:24
very important is that there are many Americans
30:26
out there, not just moderate Republicans, they're based
30:28
Democratic voters that are saying they
30:30
want to and need to hear more. Now, I
30:33
think it is very fair for people to want
30:35
to criticize those based Democratic voters and say, well,
30:37
what more do you need? You
30:39
can do that, but that is their lived reality. And so
30:41
if you were trying to win their votes, you have to
30:43
meet them where they are. There
30:45
were so many niceties on that debate stage
30:47
tonight. I am just kind of like, well,
30:50
if you agree so much with JD Vizz,
30:52
why should they vote for you? I
30:55
fully believe that Governor Wallace went out there tonight
30:57
and did what was practice in debate prep, did
30:59
what the strategy was that the
31:01
team put together. That was not the
31:04
Governor Wallace that we, that I had seen out on
31:06
the campaign trail. That's not the Governor Wallace that I
31:08
had seen during the Veep Stakes, right? That was not
31:10
the JD Vance that I know to be true. I
31:12
mean, goodness, JD Vance was on that stage, he was
31:14
sorry about Amber Thurman. He was sorry about a lot
31:17
of stuff. We
31:19
get things wrong, but do you give it the
31:21
policy? And then I just, you
31:23
know, that's not the Margaret and nor that I
31:25
know. Margaret don't do that on Sunday morning. So
31:28
I just think that I know that there's
31:30
so many people out there that want normal,
31:32
they want normalcy. They just want, you know,
31:34
just be able to just disagree with someone.
31:38
You said a lot of things I agree with. This
31:41
is not a normal election. JD
31:43
Vance is actually not Paul Ryan.
31:46
And Donald Trump sure as heck is not
31:48
Mitt Romney, okay? And what happened
31:50
on that debate stage tonight is was not
31:52
enough contrast, was not clear enough for people
31:54
sitting at home or frankly, who will probably
31:56
consume this through the clips in their local
31:58
news or here on. MSNBC or on
32:01
social media to distinguish and make a
32:03
difference. Sure, Governor Pritzker was absolutely correct.
32:05
He did a lot of lies and
32:07
people know he was correct about one
32:09
part. J.D. Vance is a lot of
32:11
lying. But everyone doesn't know that J.D.
32:13
Vance is lying. There is somewhere right
32:15
now, a Republican TikTok creator putting
32:17
up a little clip talking about how, yes, Donald
32:20
Trump saved Obamacare. There
32:23
was no one there to count. I mean,
32:25
some of this, so I think that Governor
32:27
Walz got better on the counter block and
32:29
tackling in the second half, but still. But
32:33
on that Obamacare point, so Walz came in and said,
32:35
Donald Trump was trying to get rid of Obamacare and
32:37
he would have, and he signed onto this lawsuit, lost
32:39
it, and then had a bill to get rid of
32:41
it and would have got there had it not been
32:43
for John McCain. You don't think that was a good
32:45
enough rebuttal? J.D. Vance said, well,
32:47
Donald Trump strengthened and saved Obamacare. That's what he
32:49
came back and said. Right. It's
32:51
the audacity. I agree with
32:53
you that we're in year nine and
32:55
no one knows how to cover the
32:58
audacity. The audacity is that someone should
33:00
have said, stop it. Stop. Stop. Are
33:02
you f'ing kidding me? And they should have dropped
33:04
that F bomb, right? I mean, they should have
33:06
just, this is a debate. This may be the
33:08
only chance people have to see the difference. And
33:11
instead, I'm going to go back to my toothpicks.
33:13
J.D. Vance just put one little toothpick on top
33:15
of the other and said, and I'm for this
33:17
and I'm for this. And I'm so sorry those
33:19
women died. They died because of Donald Trump. One
33:22
man had a litmus test for the people he put
33:24
on the Supreme Court and he put not one toothpick
33:27
three on because they passed a litmus test that they
33:29
would overturn Roe. And that's why Amber died. That's
33:32
why that little boy doesn't have a mom.
33:34
And nobody made that reality come to life.
33:36
Because I think if you, even if you
33:38
didn't get the contrast you were looking for,
33:40
neither did you get any, any,
33:42
you know, wake up and smell the smelling
33:44
salts, you know, sort of lulled into normalcy.
33:46
There was, let me ask you about one
33:48
other, one other subject matter and
33:50
how it went on gun
33:53
violence in schools. They both said the same thing
33:55
about how it's very sad and it breaks your
33:57
heart. And then, um,
34:00
What J.D. Vance said was, listen,
34:03
I think the reason that we have gun violence in
34:05
schools, I'm paraphrasing, is because of the southern border. And
34:08
what we need is stronger windows. He
34:10
literally used the phrase, stronger windows and
34:12
doors that lock better. And
34:16
Governor Walz came in and said, I
34:19
think sometimes the problem is the guns.
34:22
And I say that as a gun owner, somebody
34:24
used to keep a shotgun in my truck so
34:26
I could go pheasant hunting after football practice. I'm
34:28
not here to confiscate everybody's guns, but we've got
34:30
problems with gun policy in this country and that's
34:32
what it is. It's not
34:34
stronger windows is the solution to gun violence
34:36
in the schools. Now, would
34:39
that have made for a better social media
34:41
day tomorrow? Had he said it in a
34:43
punchier way? Is part of the problem here
34:45
style? I feel like on substance- The base
34:47
of part policy, part performance. You have to
34:49
hit the performance. I'm sorry, when Joe Biden
34:51
didn't hit his performance, the people were very
34:53
ready to talk about how Joe Biden didn't
34:55
hit the performance. I think though,
34:58
this was a function of a strategy that they
35:00
devised for Governor Walz. I think this was the
35:02
strategy. And frankly, when you devise, when you are
35:04
going into a debate with someone, the worst thing
35:06
you can do is ask them to be somebody
35:08
else. As you try to build them up and
35:10
try to have them, just put
35:12
on a little something extra that you wouldn't
35:14
usually do. Governor Walz should have
35:17
been able to go on there and be Tim Walz. And
35:19
I think we saw a little more Tim Walz towards
35:21
the mid, later into the debate, but in the beginning, it
35:24
was very clear that he was, doing
35:26
what they had agreed upon the strategy and debate
35:29
prep. You know, I don't think it
35:31
was a good strategy. I disagree
35:33
with you on, I do agree
35:35
that he was following the strategy he was given by
35:37
the campaign, but I don't think
35:39
that this was a debate that was designed
35:41
to move people off of their team if
35:43
they were already on it. This debate is
35:45
not gonna move very many people. There is
35:47
a very small, narrow group of people who
35:49
have not made up their minds about Donald
35:51
Trump and Kamala Harris. That small, narrow group
35:53
of people, when you poll them, you talk
35:55
to them, they seem to want, number one,
35:58
more stuff. substance, they keep asking, I need
36:00
to know more, I need to know more,
36:02
I need to know more details. Tim
36:04
Walz was very detailed and he spoke the
36:06
way a governor speaks about really specific issues
36:08
like gun violence, like healthcare. He was substantive
36:11
and knowledgeable. So if you're that person who
36:13
the thing that's keeping you on the fence
36:15
is you need more details, he gave you
36:17
more details. Number two,
36:19
I don't think that small, narrow group
36:21
of people wanted to see a fistfight.
36:24
And so I think that the people who want the
36:26
fistfight are the base of the Democratic Party. That's
36:29
want to see someone get up
36:31
there and give a knuckle sandwich to Donald
36:33
Trump. That's what they want. But that is
36:35
not the group of people who need this
36:37
debate. Most people are already voting, already know
36:40
what they want. I think the reason that
36:42
Tim Walz was effective in the way he
36:44
did it, he wasn't angry, he was disappointed.
36:46
And that's actually in some ways stronger if
36:48
I'm that undecided and it is a strange
36:50
group of people, these people who can't decide
36:52
between arsenic and pancakes. You
36:56
know, it's like it's very hard to say
36:58
these two things are equal, but there are
37:00
those people. And when I've heard them talk,
37:02
they say things like, I don't know, I
37:05
don't understand Vice President Harris's policies on X,
37:07
Y, and Z. Tim Walz gave you that
37:09
specificity that I think is going to get
37:11
those people to feel more comfortable. And his
37:13
job was to make people feel comfortable. And
37:15
last thing I'll say is to provide a
37:17
permission structure for people who aren't core Democrats
37:19
to come over. And that
37:21
lack of meanness, the kindness, the fact that he says,
37:23
you know, I want to agree with this guy. I
37:26
think that we agree on a lot of things. I
37:28
hate to say it. A lot undecided. That's
37:30
what they want to hear. I just want to note
37:33
that there are a lot of base Democratic voters who
37:35
are not undecided about whether they want to vote for
37:37
Kamala Harris or Donald Trump. They're undecided if they are
37:39
going to vote. And
37:41
I just think if people listen to people,
37:44
listen to some of the voters that they're saying
37:46
that we, Melissa Murray and I talked to, I
37:48
know there were a lot of people who were
37:50
very good. A lot of consternation about some of
37:52
the young women we spoke to in the nail
37:54
shop and our black women in America wrote 20,
37:56
24 special. But
37:59
that young woman. said she didn't think her vote mattered,
38:01
she lives in North Carolina. And
38:03
you can walk her down about her
38:05
position, or you can meet her where
38:08
she is and let her know why her vote matters.
38:10
And what I have heard from a lot of people across the
38:12
country, not strategists, not political strategists,
38:15
just regular people that aren't as tuned
38:17
in, they feel like the campaign
38:19
is doing a lot right now to talk
38:21
to Republican voters, those people in the middle,
38:23
and that they don't think that they need
38:25
to persuade pieces of the base, and they
38:27
do. To me, this feels very much so
38:30
similar right now to 2016, more than it
38:32
does to 2020. That woman
38:34
in the nail shop, had you been able to
38:36
remote control Tim Walz like a drone tonight,
38:39
what would you have had him say or
38:41
do that might have moved her? I think
38:43
the housing conversation, the second part of the
38:45
housing conversation, I think Governor Walz was very,
38:47
I think housing is very important to people
38:49
across the country. When they say affordability and
38:51
the economy, that's what they're talking about. Talking
38:54
about housing, they're talking about rent, they're talking
38:56
about grocery prices. But I thought that housing
38:58
conversation was clear. I thought, I think abortion
39:00
was something that she herself said was important
39:02
to her and the healthcare piece. I think
39:04
sometimes when we get into policy,
39:06
healthcare conversation, it gets a little theoretical.
39:10
But I just think that how you deliver
39:12
the message does matter. And yes, you can
39:14
say it, and you could say, oh, you
39:16
said it, but how
39:18
you say it matters. Yeah. First
39:21
of all, let me ask, do we need to go to Jacob right now? Is
39:23
he ready for us? Okay, he is,
39:26
good. Jacob Soboroff is
39:28
in Oakland University
39:30
in Rochester, Michigan. We spoke with
39:32
him as he was setting up with a bunch of
39:34
students who are going to be watching the debate there at a watch party.
39:37
And he's convinced them to stick around even though the
39:39
debate ended, which itself is a Herculean effort. Jacob,
39:42
take it away. How'd it go? Rachel, look at all the people.
39:44
You guys, thank you very much for sticking around. I really appreciate
39:46
you guys sticking around. The green flags and the red flags, they
39:48
did the whole thing and it was amazing. And
39:58
they don't have them any longer. And
40:00
I don't know if this is gonna surprise
40:02
you. These are not undecided voters necessarily. These
40:04
are voters who could very well tip the
40:07
outcome of the election come
40:09
election day because they live in one of
40:11
the most consequential counties in all of Michigan,
40:13
Oakland County. It was 100,000, as I told
40:15
you before the debate, 100,000
40:18
votes swing from Trump to Biden in the 2020
40:20
election. McCone County,
40:22
one of the neighboring counties is also a very
40:24
important swing county here. Let's just start with a
40:26
show of hands. Did anybody come into this debate
40:29
and leave feeling differently than when they came in
40:31
in terms of candidate? Raise your hand if you
40:34
changed your opinion of the
40:36
candidates because of this debate. Oh,
40:38
really, one. Come on down, dude. Come on down.
40:41
Come on down. Come on down. Come
40:43
on down. Very surprising. What's
40:46
your name? Henry. Henry, what's going
40:48
on? Okay, so you came in feeling what? I
40:51
felt like JD Vance would have been a lot worse. I
40:54
think he's very awkward. His
40:56
other public appearances have been very awkward. I'm
40:58
thinking back to the scenario in the ice
41:01
cream shop where he just made it so
41:03
awkward for the employee and
41:05
they don't want to be on camera. Might have been the
41:07
donut, too, right? Yeah, I just thought, well,
41:09
why can't he just be normal like the rest
41:11
of us? And that's how you felt coming out
41:14
of here. I felt he did a lot better.
41:16
He spoke, I feel the way JD
41:18
Vance works is he works very well when he has a lot
41:20
of preparation. This is
41:22
the debate, he knows about it weeks in advance. So
41:25
he's able to repair. He felt like he prepared better here. I
41:27
think he prepared very well. So one of the
41:29
things, will you do me a favor? These are for you. Thank you very much. Thank
41:32
you. One of the things guys that I thought got the
41:34
strongest reaction here was Jimenez was talking about guns at the
41:36
beginning of the debate. And one
41:38
of the strongest reactions here I thought
41:40
was interesting was Rachel, what you were just talking about
41:43
when JD Vance said, one of the ways ultimately
41:45
that we can stop gun violence in this country is
41:48
by having better locks on
41:50
our doors. Did anybody
41:52
react? You're laughing back
41:54
here. No, you. What's
41:57
your name? Nora. What'd you think when
41:59
you heard JD Vance? talk about that. Jimena was
42:01
talking about how because of what happened at one
42:03
of your neighboring schools here, it's an issue that
42:05
rings close to home. I thought it
42:07
was ridiculous. I mean, the issue
42:10
is guns. The issue is not better locks
42:12
on doors. Reproductive
42:14
freedom is also something that got a big
42:16
reaction in this room. And I saw a
42:18
lot of green flags go up when Governor
42:21
Walz was talking about how he
42:24
wants to protect a woman's right to make her
42:26
own choices. I see you reacting strongly here. Really
42:28
ultimately, guys, what this is about is enthusiasm and
42:30
whether or not in this state that had the
42:32
highest youth voter turnout in the 2022 midterm
42:34
elections, whether or not folks like this are going
42:36
to be compelled to come out. These guys are
42:38
compelled to stay here until 11 o'clock, 11,
42:41
excuse me, 27 on a school night. You
42:44
know, you heard that answer. What did you think? Um,
42:48
sorry, could you repeat that? Reproductive freedom. What
42:50
did you think when you heard Governor
42:52
Walz say that he thought it was a
42:54
woman's right to make
42:56
her own choices? I completely agree with
42:58
that. Like, I feel like that should
43:00
be considered common sense almost, but
43:03
it isn't. It's become such a heated debate
43:05
for what feels like should be
43:07
a no brainer. And he just kind of voiced
43:09
that. The other one was immigration. I thought, God,
43:11
and you guys correct me if you feel like
43:13
I'm misstating everything here. But on immigration, they're
43:16
number one, there was a loud laugh in this room when
43:18
those mics got shut off. And
43:21
that was, of course, around the issue of
43:24
the Haitians that are in Springfield, Ohio
43:26
under the temporary protected status. J.D.
43:29
Vance was saying Senator Vance was saying that they were
43:31
there illegally. Of course, that wasn't true. The moderators pointed
43:33
out and they cut the mic. But
43:35
I also thought you guys in the room
43:37
responded strongly to the pushback on
43:40
the point that President
43:42
Biden and Vice President Harris put forward
43:44
one of the strongest and most conservative,
43:47
actually, Republican bills in
43:49
recent history. And Donald Trump killed that
43:51
bill. Did anybody did that? Did
43:54
that ring true? You're up here. Let me just come up
43:56
here with you real quick. You're not in your
43:58
head. Yes. Hi, what's your name? Why
44:00
was that something James that resonated
44:02
with you? It is true. Congress
44:05
has power for these immigration policies
44:07
and it just keeps getting pushed back
44:10
between presidency to presidency, which Congress does
44:12
have power in these situations. It's
44:15
really just forming a demonization of immigrants, which
44:17
is such an issue. We
44:19
see a lot of violence against immigrant communities.
44:21
These are not illegal people. They
44:24
come here undocumented for whatever reason
44:26
there is. And it's just causing
44:28
more harm than anything. And we just
44:30
need to push towards true policy rather than
44:32
all these talk points. I appreciate it, you
44:34
guys. And I guess maybe the final
44:36
thing that I just wanted to ask, we
44:39
were talking, Marcus, about this constant criticism about
44:41
the vice president not being able...about the vice
44:43
president being in office for these last...he's already
44:45
upset about it. The vice president being in
44:47
office for all these years and not being
44:50
able to make the change was the allegation
44:52
from JD Vance. You said to me, I've
44:54
been to high school civics class. Why
44:56
did you say that? Because if anybody
44:59
took high school civics class, they'd know what
45:01
the vice president can do and what the
45:03
vice president can do. I want to make
45:05
a quick point. Neither candidate
45:07
on that stage talked about what executive
45:09
action they're going to take on day
45:11
one to do what they want, nor
45:13
were they asked, because they know that
45:15
they can't. That's not how the
45:17
vice presidency works. You don't get to do what you
45:20
want. You do what the president delegates you to do.
45:22
So that... That one day, Marcus, is going to
45:25
be all of our teachers in civics class, guys. I
45:27
want to thank you all very much for
45:29
being here. And Rachel, just reiterate
45:31
how important that these voters are, the enthusiasm
45:33
that is here. You can really feel it.
45:37
And it's exciting to be here with all of you guys.
45:39
We appreciate it very much. And I know they
45:41
do too back in the studio. Rachel, back to you. Fate of
45:43
the Nation is in your hands from Madam
45:45
President Ximena and to all of them. Very,
45:48
very thankful. Very thankful to you,
45:50
Jacob, for being there with them. It's inspiring to see them. Thanks,
45:53
Rachel. All right. Thanks, guys.
45:57
Jen Psaki has joined us. Jen, what is your
45:59
reaction to the debate? We have lots of heated
46:01
and interesting discussion, lots of different points of view
46:03
here. First of all, I want to get Marcus
46:05
an internship. Yes, exactly. He knows
46:07
better how civics works and how government works than
46:10
most people. Look, I
46:12
felt that if you're sitting at home and
46:14
you were watching and you were not fact
46:16
checking and you weren't familiar with what JD
46:18
Vance had said previously or what Donald Trump
46:20
stood for, he seemed at
46:22
many moments to be reasonable. And
46:25
that was clearly a change in tone. And I know
46:27
you all were talking about the strategic shift there. That
46:30
was interesting to watch. Watching Tim
46:32
Malls, what I thought about was when he
46:34
emerged onto the scene, we all probably interviewed
46:36
him five times during Veep Stakes, he
46:39
would propel himself single-handedly into Veep
46:41
Stakes, right? He became the running
46:43
mate because they're chemistry, but also
46:46
because he was so effective at
46:48
connecting people authentically and
46:51
organically on television. He's
46:53
been absent. I think that's a huge mistake
46:57
to hold him back and not put him
46:59
out there. Meaning he hasn't been on the
47:01
media for a while. He hasn't been out
47:03
in the media for a while. He's been
47:05
absent. I do think that's a missed opportunity.
47:07
But tonight I felt like he was spending
47:09
a lot of time in the first half
47:11
or two thirds, proving he read the briefing
47:13
materials and I was missing the magic and
47:15
the organic spontaneity of Tim Malls. I know
47:17
you already all talked about the January 6th
47:20
moment, which I thought was great, and the
47:22
moment on healthcare also great. I loved it
47:24
when he quoted the Bible and made it
47:26
about morality on immigration. But
47:28
coming out of it, I hope that they
47:30
free Tim Malls and put him out there
47:33
and let him be rusty at times and
47:35
make mistakes and hug football players and cry
47:37
and be funny sometimes. That's the
47:39
magic. That's why he's on the ticket. Do you
47:42
feel like there was a transition from over the
47:44
course of the debate? I feel like after that
47:46
first break when he came back is when he
47:48
landed all his punches. Yes, he
47:50
was clearly nervous. Who wouldn't be? It's the biggest moment
47:52
you've ever been on in your life on that stage
47:55
he was on tonight. There was a shift I felt,
47:57
maybe about 45, 50 minutes in. around
48:00
abortion, he was quite strong. And I was thinking to myself, and
48:02
we've talked about this, we are now on
48:04
a stage in 2024 where men are
48:07
very comfortable running for office and talking
48:09
in detail about abortion rights and sepsis
48:11
and everything that can happen. And that
48:13
is in itself is progress. On
48:15
gun violence, I thought he was stronger and obviously
48:18
the moment on January 6th, it took him a
48:20
while to get there. My point is, I think
48:22
he's an enormous asset to the campaign. I think
48:24
people really connect with him. That's
48:26
why he's on the ticket. And he should
48:28
be out there more because when he gets
48:30
into a groove, it's sometimes messy, sometimes says
48:32
funny things that are slightly off. That's okay.
48:34
He connects with people because that's who he
48:36
is. And I hope we see more of
48:38
that. That very difficult exchange at the end
48:41
about January 6th, about Vance being
48:43
unable or unwilling to answer about who won the
48:45
2020 election is going
48:47
to be one that sticks. That
48:49
is going to be an important part of
48:51
the legacy of this debate, but also a
48:53
quicker earlier moment in the debate where J.D.
48:56
Vance told a lie that
48:58
is really, really going to stick to
49:00
him, that he told very bluntly, very
49:03
cleanly, and very much 180 degrees wrong.
49:06
And the antidote to it, the fact check on
49:09
it, is himself on tape. That
49:11
one is really, really going to stick to him. We'll
49:13
have that for you right on the other side of
49:15
this break. We'll be right back. Stay with us here
49:17
on MSNBC. When
49:21
Donald Trump said, I've got a
49:23
concept of a plan, it cracked me up as a
49:25
fourth grade teacher because my kids would have never given
49:27
me that. But what Senator Vance
49:30
just explained might be worse than a concept
49:32
because what he explained is pre-Obamacare. And I'll
49:34
make this as simple as possible because I
49:36
have done this for a long time. What
49:39
they're saying is, if you're
49:41
healthy, why should you be paying more?
49:44
So what they're going to do is let insurance
49:46
companies pick who they insure. MSNBC's
49:50
Lawrence O'Donnell. When I worked for
49:53
Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, I learned
49:55
about commitment. Building New York's
49:57
newest train station was Senator Moynihan's idea.
50:00
It took 30 years and never giving
50:02
up. When we register to vote, we
50:05
make a lifetime commitment to democracy, a
50:07
commitment to vote for all levels of
50:09
government working together to
50:11
build a better America. The Last
50:14
Word with Lawrence O'Donnell, weeknights
50:16
at 10 p.m. Eastern on MSNBC.
50:20
Hi, I'm Stacey Abrams, voting
50:23
rights advocate, author, admitted
50:25
nerd, and now host of the
50:27
brand new Cricut podcast, Assembly Required
50:29
with Stacey Abrams. Whether it's reforming
50:31
the electoral college, solving America's loneliness
50:33
epidemic, or tackling the future of
50:36
Hollywood, I'm breaking it all down
50:38
to answer, how do we get
50:40
here, and what can we
50:42
do to get good done? Are you in?
50:45
Join me for Assembly Required with Stacey
50:47
Abrams. Comments are available wherever
50:49
you get your podcasts. What's
50:51
causing the rise in book banning? On my podcast,
50:54
Velshi Band Book Club, I speak with authors of
50:56
banned books to try and find out. Season
50:59
two of Velshi Band Book Club. Listen
51:01
now. Senator
51:07
about that, he mentioned, I think referring to
51:09
a national ban. In the past, you have
51:11
supported a federal ban on
51:14
abortion after 15 weeks. In
51:16
fact, you said if someone can't
51:18
support legislation like that, quote, you
51:21
are making the United States the
51:23
most barbaric pro-abortion regime anywhere in
51:25
the entire world. My question
51:27
is, why have you changed your position? Well,
51:30
Nora, first of all, I never supported a
51:32
national ban. I did during when I was
51:34
running for Senate in 2022 talk about setting
51:36
some minimum national standard. Okay, okay,
51:39
okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, but
51:41
wait, I never
51:43
supported a national ban. I talked
51:45
about setting some minimum national standard.
51:47
I never supported a national ban.
51:51
Do we have tape of
51:53
reality here? I
51:56
certainly would like abortion to be illegal nationally.
52:00
So if you're on tape saying,
52:02
I certainly would like abortion to
52:04
be illegal nationally, that
52:06
means you supported a national ban on
52:09
abortion. J.D. Vance,
52:11
an incredibly slick, facile
52:14
talker. I mean, he's a professional talking head. This
52:16
is what he's been doing his whole adult life.
52:19
But on that one, on an issue that
52:21
important to lie on something that bluntly, I
52:23
feel like Ari, that's going to follow him
52:25
around a little bit. Yeah, it's a huge
52:27
deal. It might have been the most significant
52:29
substantive gaffe. We were having debate earlier on
52:31
the table about style. Yeah. This
52:34
was a substantive, huge error. He
52:36
lied. He lied because his past
52:38
position is too close to the
52:40
real Donald Trump, Project 2025 position.
52:43
The GOP platform also talks this up.
52:45
It doesn't use the national ban language.
52:48
But this is the person,
52:51
Donald Trump, who put the people on the court
52:53
to overturn Roe. They all pledged to do it.
52:56
They're not just looking for some
52:58
interstate quilt program, which is
53:00
what they've currently fallen back on as a,
53:02
I would again, I say this respectfully, but
53:04
a nonsensical or illogical defense of their position.
53:06
They are looking long term and it's all
53:08
out there for a national ban, which means
53:10
wherever you live in the country, California,
53:13
New York, wherever, that would be their
53:15
policy. And they're giving away the game
53:18
everywhere in the country that Republicans are
53:20
in control. Right now, there is an
53:22
abortion ban. Yes. And so if you
53:25
want abortion to be banned, vote for
53:27
Republicans. Everywhere they get power, they do
53:29
it. And this is J.D. Vance and
53:32
Donald Trump saying they want power nationally.
53:34
And Harris, here is J.D. Vance bluntly
53:36
lying about his overt statement that he
53:39
wants it illegal nationwide. And just briefly,
53:41
that's why it's so important that he
53:43
also admitted under questioning, wait, I thought
53:46
we agreed on no fact
53:48
checking. That's important if lying about your
53:50
positions from abortion policy to what happened
53:52
on January 6 is central to your
53:54
campaign and how you plan to hopefully
53:56
win over votes is by lying to
53:59
people. On a lighter note, it
54:01
reminded me a little bit of the famous Saturday Night
54:03
Live impression of the Gerald Ford debate when he said,
54:05
I thought there would be no math. And
54:07
the joke was the president has to deal
54:09
with these things. I thought that was a
54:11
real giveaway from Vans. I
54:13
think there's lies and there's misrepresenting things,
54:16
right? So J.D. Vance showed up tonight
54:18
to sort of put a smoother sheen
54:20
on Trumpism, which is interesting because it's
54:22
the opposite of who he is on
54:24
the campaign trail. On the campaign trail,
54:26
he is the most aggressive, the most
54:29
offensive. But his goal was to sort
54:31
of take you back to this idea
54:33
that pre-COVID life was great. We had
54:35
this great economy. And people like to
54:37
tend to go back and believe that
54:39
forgetting that Donald Trump had the same
54:41
economy, slightly worse than President Obama did.
54:44
But he really got up there
54:46
and lied or stretched things when
54:48
he would immediately link migrants, illegal
54:50
migrants, which they're not in Springfield,
54:52
Ohio, to the lack of affordable
54:54
housing, which simply isn't true. He
54:56
all but said Donald Trump protected
54:58
Obamacare. And in those cases, you're watching
55:00
Tim All's going, come on, like, are you going to
55:02
get in there? Are you going
55:04
to get in there? And it wasn't
55:06
until J.D. Vance simply wouldn't
55:09
say that Joe Biden won the
55:11
election free and fair. And
55:13
that's kind of what gave the game away.
55:15
They're like, yes, he was slick. He gave a
55:17
great excuse to lots of people who don't want
55:19
to publicly say that they're voting for Trump. They're
55:22
like, he's okay. Right then and there, you're like, oh,
55:24
everything that you said before this, I'm not so sure
55:27
of. We all know who won the election.
55:29
You know, we played a little bit from that portion at the end
55:31
of the debate, the discussion about January 6th, the discussion
55:33
about whether or not we respect election results. We
55:35
played a little bit of it before, but there's one other
55:37
piece of it that we haven't played yet that and we're all
55:40
talking about it. So let's just hear it. I
55:43
see a candidate out there who
55:45
refused. And now again, and this I'm pretty
55:48
shocked by this. He lost the election. When
55:51
Mike Pence made that decision
55:54
to certify that election, that's why
55:56
Mike Pence isn't on this stage. What
55:59
I'm concerned about is where is
56:01
the firewall with Donald Trump?
56:04
Where is the firewall if he knows
56:07
he could do anything including
56:10
taking an election and
56:12
his vice president's not going to stand to it? That's
56:14
what we're asking you America. Will you
56:16
stand up? Will you keep your oath
56:18
of office even if the
56:20
president doesn't? So America I think you've
56:22
got a really clear choice on this
56:24
election of who's going to honor that
56:26
democracy and who's going to honor Donald
56:28
Trump. Stuff got real right
56:31
there up until then they were trying to
56:33
be more cordial. I heard you all the
56:35
analysis tonight you know it seemed more normal
56:37
right there that's when normal stops
56:39
right and you say where's the firewall because it's
56:41
not necessarily going to be the speaker of the
56:43
house and it's definitely not going to be this
56:45
guy if he's the VP. And let's explain the
56:47
firewall point and maybe Wall should have explained it
56:49
in the moment but he's saying listen we
56:52
all saw that Donald Trump lost the
56:54
election claimed that he didn't lose and
56:57
then unleashed hell in this country to
56:59
try to hold on to power even
57:01
though we lost. The firewall was Mike
57:03
Pence. Mike Pence not only
57:06
respecting the Constitution but being willing to stand
57:08
up to Donald Trump and not do what
57:10
Donald Trump was ordering him to do. He
57:12
was the firewall. JD Vance will not be
57:14
a firewall and that's why he got the
57:16
job. Nor will Mike Johnson. And he could
57:18
have said that. I mean JD Vance is
57:20
on television basically saying he would help him
57:23
with another fake electors plan. Yes that may
57:25
or may not be why he is the
57:27
running mate currently it probably is a big
57:29
part of it. The other piece
57:31
we haven't played this but I wrote
57:33
this down with like exclamation points where
57:35
JD Vance said he'll have my prayers
57:37
best wishes and my help. That's what
57:39
JD Vance said about Kamala Harris and
57:42
Tim Walz if they won. And
57:44
that was part of the Earth
57:46
too as you like to say
57:49
the alternative universe whatever you may
57:51
call it. You're like buddy your
57:54
campaign is currently planning to suppress
57:56
votes to challenge votes to use
57:58
lawsuits to make it to challenge
58:01
the outcome. I mean, that was,
58:04
I mean, a jarring moment. Tim Walz had
58:06
some good moments, but there were some missed
58:08
moments too. And I don't think we can
58:10
emphasize this enough. It's called a bloodless
58:13
coup for a reason. There's
58:15
also a bloody coup. They did try both. But let's
58:17
remember, we've reported on it, and Rachel, you've warned about
58:19
it. I think everyone at this table has reported on
58:21
it. The original move
58:24
before they resorted to storming the
58:26
Capitol was the bloodless coup of
58:28
trying to get the states or
58:31
the alternate electors to
58:33
override the congressional certification without storming
58:35
the Capitol. And as Vance put
58:37
it, throw it to the
58:40
Congress for a big old fight. That
58:42
fight involves overturning the will
58:44
of the voters. And so when he says that
58:46
publicly and he showed, again, I thought
58:49
there were some moments, I do think for the record,
58:53
J.D. Vance was able to pretend that he's more
58:56
rational or logical-seeming in
58:58
these 90 minutes than he is day to
59:00
day and whether that works for him politically
59:02
is a point. But there were those revelations.
59:05
And so when he's caught there, unable to
59:07
acknowledge the winner of the last election, who's
59:09
the current president, which is a giveaway that
59:11
you're still working within the
59:13
big lie and double down on what
59:15
he said, which is we want to
59:17
throw it to the Congress. Everything else
59:20
is B.S. That's where I think our
59:22
friend Nicole Walls was calling for the
59:24
F-bombs. And I'll give you one. It
59:26
was frivolous. It was a
59:28
frivolous claim as far as
59:30
I can go. A different F-bomb. On
59:32
MSNBC, it's as far as we're going
59:35
to go here, family television. But that
59:37
was important because, yeah, you want to
59:39
stand up and go, wait a minute.
59:41
And I thought, you know, basically,
59:44
Walls was able to do some of it. The moderators,
59:46
I thought, did a decent job, but they
59:48
didn't do a ton in that moment to be like, this
59:50
is nuts. The person standing up
59:52
here is promising another. And again, I
59:55
say bloodless. He did not. I'm not
59:57
saying he advocated a Proud Boys insurrection,
59:59
but he did advocate the end of American
1:00:01
democracy. But that's the whole enchilada, right? Discussing
1:00:04
health care, the economy, all that
1:00:06
stuff is nonsense. Are
1:00:08
you going to accept the outcome
1:00:10
of the election results? Are you
1:00:12
participating in politics, or is
1:00:14
this just before the war? Yes, yes. That's
1:00:16
the question here, right? Are you going to
1:00:19
seize power, or are you going
1:00:21
to accept that people vote on who's in
1:00:23
power? Because those are the only two choices.
1:00:26
And to not be able to get a clear
1:00:28
answer on that is, as you say, the whole
1:00:30
enchilada. On
1:00:32
the point, actually, this is not on
1:00:34
this point at all. But this is something that Joy and
1:00:36
I want to show you. Because
1:00:39
I know that you and I
1:00:41
are old enough and have similar
1:00:44
enough internet tastes that you remember
1:00:46
dramatic chipmunk. Do
1:00:48
you remember dramatic chipmunk? It turns out it was dramatic
1:00:51
prairie dog. Do we have dramatic chipmunk? No,
1:00:55
no, no, not the honey badger. Do we have it? I
1:00:58
thought it was a chipmunk, but it's a prairie dog. Intriguing.
1:01:01
Yeah, hold on. Where is it? Come
1:01:05
on. See, does it look like a... Yeah, I know
1:01:07
it. I think I know exactly what you're talking about.
1:01:09
Yes. OK. Yes, I do. Yes, I do. Remember
1:01:12
it. OK. So dramatic chipmunk
1:01:14
was a thing. And the
1:01:16
moment... I think, do we have this actual thought
1:01:18
of it, where the chipmunk kind of turns and
1:01:20
faces the camera and raises the eye like that?
1:01:22
Because there was a number of
1:01:24
things... There was a number of incidents
1:01:26
in the vice presidential debate tonight where
1:01:29
J.D. Vance was looking at Tim Walz,
1:01:31
looking at him from the side, and
1:01:33
then turned without moving his head and
1:01:35
raised the eyebrows of the camera like that,
1:01:37
basically to make eye contact with the audience at
1:01:39
home, like, do you believe this guy? Anyway,
1:01:43
I just wanted to say, Joy, I... You know what?
1:01:45
I made that face when J.D.
1:01:48
Vance said that Donald Trump
1:01:50
peacefully turned over
1:01:52
power... On January 20th. On
1:01:54
January 20th. Yeah. How about he talked
1:01:56
about all the bipartisan ways he went.
1:01:58
Saving a Obamacare. during those four
1:02:01
years. And to me, I struggle to find
1:02:03
this big group of undecided voters in America.
1:02:05
I think there's a lot of people who
1:02:07
aren't necessarily saying who they're going to vote
1:02:09
for and what JD Vance did. I can
1:02:11
tell you on my phone tonight, it was
1:02:13
filled with people who love to say, see,
1:02:15
he's totally normal, don't you think? He put
1:02:17
on the show that people who were already
1:02:20
voting for Trump needed and wanted to feel
1:02:22
okay about it. Let's go to Alex Wagner,
1:02:24
who is in the spin room at the
1:02:26
site of the debate with our friend Claire
1:02:28
McCaskill. I
1:02:30
just want you to know that Claire McCaskill risked
1:02:32
life and limb to get into this room, almost
1:02:35
got bounced from the debate hall.
1:02:37
I thought they were going to tase me trying
1:02:39
to get into the spin room. The
1:02:42
Secret Service was a little out of control
1:02:44
here tonight. Like most Americans, we blame Donald
1:02:46
Trump Jr. for the problems. Yes. But
1:02:49
I do want to call your, he's
1:02:51
sitting right next to us, so I won't go
1:02:53
on at length about that. But Secret Service protection,
1:02:55
much more hardcore at this debate than the last
1:02:57
one. Claire, there is a
1:02:59
new sort of CBS, I will call
1:03:02
it a snap hole after this debate,
1:03:04
and the people who are asked, who
1:03:06
won the VP debate? 42%
1:03:08
of them say JD Vance won it, 41%
1:03:10
say Governor Walz won it, 17% say it's a tie. Does
1:03:14
anything about that surprise you? No, I think
1:03:16
the debate, first of all, JD
1:03:19
Vance tried to do one thing and he
1:03:21
focused on it. He tried to be Tim
1:03:23
Walz. He tried to be
1:03:25
the nice guy. And he was very
1:03:27
smooth. And the
1:03:30
other thing about JD Vance is that he's
1:03:32
a better liar than Donald Trump. He
1:03:36
wraps it up in prettier ribbon with
1:03:38
a bigger bow and
1:03:40
does it with such a straight face
1:03:42
and does it so effortlessly. Trump,
1:03:45
lots of times when he lies, you kind
1:03:47
of can tell, no, this
1:03:49
guy's a really good liar. And he
1:03:52
obviously lied. I mean, I had that foul on my
1:03:54
chair when he said on the
1:03:56
ACA because I was there. I was in
1:03:58
the Senate chamber when- McCain
1:04:00
walked in and gave the thumbs down.
1:04:02
I know what Donald Trump tried to do to
1:04:05
the ACA. And the idea that
1:04:07
he would try to pretend that somehow he was
1:04:09
protecting it. The other thing that struck me about
1:04:11
the debate is I think most Americans, and I
1:04:13
know you guys have probably talked about this already,
1:04:16
but most Americans don't see the
1:04:18
vice president as the policymaker. And
1:04:21
I don't remember any time during the debate
1:04:23
that they talked about the Pence years when
1:04:26
Trump was president. The Pence administration. The
1:04:28
Pence administration. And the Pence did all
1:04:30
these things. And
1:04:33
so I don't think most Americans
1:04:35
really believe the vice president has
1:04:37
the power to pass
1:04:39
legislation and implement policy unless
1:04:42
she is working on behalf of
1:04:44
the president she's serving. So
1:04:47
I don't think that is, I think that's
1:04:49
one of the reasons probably the debate polling
1:04:51
is so close. And
1:04:54
I think the debate probably in the long
1:04:56
run, even though Trump, the answer was a
1:04:58
really good liar. And even though he tried
1:05:01
to be really nice, I think
1:05:03
it's probably a wash. I
1:05:05
talked to Jason Miller, the senior Trump campaign
1:05:07
advisor, after the debate. And I brought up
1:05:09
the January 6 exchange
1:05:11
at the end of the debate. And I said, you know, is
1:05:14
that a problem for your campaign? And he said,
1:05:16
if that's all Democrats have, then
1:05:18
I'm not worried. What do you
1:05:21
think? I think they should
1:05:23
be worried. I think it was so
1:05:25
stark. It was at the end of the debate. It was
1:05:27
a dramatic moment. It was unbelievable
1:05:29
that he would not say that Trump
1:05:31
lost the election. He would not say
1:05:33
that they would not try to do
1:05:35
the same play again. So I do
1:05:39
think that was the most damning moment, as
1:05:41
some of our colleagues said earlier. That's kind
1:05:43
of when it all fell apart, I think,
1:05:46
for Vance at the end. And you realize,
1:05:48
OK, maybe this all was just an act. And he
1:05:50
really is just a Donald Trump
1:05:52
wannabe. I am disturbed by the phenomenon that
1:05:54
you have called out, which is this attempt
1:05:57
to revise history in real time. It's something
1:05:59
our own. Steve Bannon at MSNBC
1:06:01
has written a book about, but the idea
1:06:03
that you can basically rewrite the facts minutes
1:06:06
after they unfolded, whether or not it's Donald
1:06:08
Trump saying he had nothing to do with
1:06:10
the killing of the Langford Bipartisan Immigration Bill,
1:06:12
whether it's J.D. Vance saying he never supported
1:06:14
a national abortion ban. And the question is,
1:06:16
is the sort of universe
1:06:19
of information so bivarcated into the
1:06:21
truth and the not-truth, Earth-1 and
1:06:23
Earth-2, that all of those
1:06:25
assertions on the Vance Trump ticket don't
1:06:28
actually matter, that the lies don't matter? Or do
1:06:30
you think the truth actually eventually breaks through? I
1:06:32
don't know, but I do know this. There
1:06:35
is something deeply ironic that they had
1:06:37
a debate question about
1:06:40
Tim Walz misspeaking about when he was in
1:06:42
China 35 years ago, but
1:06:45
Donald Trump said some outrageous lies
1:06:47
today and every day makes outrageous
1:06:49
lies. And there was not one
1:06:51
question about being a vice presidential
1:06:53
candidate to a man who says
1:06:56
daily, massive things. I mean,
1:06:58
just what he said about Kim and
1:07:01
President Biden in the hurricane
1:07:03
disaster just yesterday. The
1:07:06
idea that they're making a big deal out of a
1:07:09
misstatement of Walz when Donald
1:07:11
Trump is a walking line machine.
1:07:13
Literally every minute, every
1:07:15
hour on the hour. Unbelievable. Senator
1:07:18
Claire McCaskill, take her to the club because she's going
1:07:20
to get you in. Over to you, Rachel. What
1:07:24
would we have done had you actually got
1:07:26
tased though, Claire? Honestly, I mean,
1:07:28
we would have had it would have been a story. It
1:07:31
would have been a story. Alex,
1:07:33
would you please accompany me? What
1:07:37
got me mad was I found out they let
1:07:40
Hannity in and they were about to let the
1:07:42
dog puppet in and they hadn't
1:07:44
let me in. I'm going, come on,
1:07:46
guys. The dog puppet was advocating, the
1:07:48
Daily Show dog puppet was advocating for
1:07:50
the Senator to let out. Well,
1:07:53
thank you. The dog puppet actually said Claire
1:07:55
should go in before the dog puppet. I
1:07:57
said thank you for that. what
1:08:00
if there's one thing that can bring Americans together,
1:08:02
I mean I really feel like the dog puppet
1:08:04
can show us the way we're glad you're OK
1:08:06
say thank you to the dog for us. All
1:08:09
right we're going to take a very quick
1:08:11
break. Our MSNBC coverage of tonight's vice presidential
1:08:13
debate continues right after this day with us.
1:08:30
Backman and Dejan news and
1:08:32
all MSNBC original podcasts are
1:08:34
available ad free and with
1:08:37
bonus content, including how to
1:08:39
win 2024
1:08:41
prosecuting Donald Trump. Why is this happening?
1:08:43
Velshe Band book club and more right
1:08:46
now with MSNBC premium. You can listen
1:08:48
to the latest episode of how to
1:08:50
win 2024 available
1:08:53
exclusively to subscribers. Presidential historian
1:08:55
Michael Beshloss takes a deep
1:08:57
dive into some of the
1:09:00
most notable moments in past
1:09:02
vice presidential debates and how
1:09:04
they move the needle in
1:09:06
past elections subscribe to MSNBC
1:09:08
premium on Apple podcasts.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More