Private credit investing with Ares Management’s Mike Arougheti

Private credit investing with Ares Management’s Mike Arougheti

Released Tuesday, 23rd July 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Private credit investing with Ares Management’s Mike Arougheti

Private credit investing with Ares Management’s Mike Arougheti

Private credit investing with Ares Management’s Mike Arougheti

Private credit investing with Ares Management’s Mike Arougheti

Tuesday, 23rd July 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:04

Welcome to Goldman Sachs Exchanges, Great

0:06

Investors. I'm Alison Mass, Chairman of

0:08

Investment Banking within Goldman Sachs' global

0:10

banking and markets business and your

0:12

host for today's episode. Today, I'm

0:14

thrilled to be sitting down with

0:16

Mike Aragheti, the co-founder and

0:19

CEO of Aries Management. Aries

0:21

is one of the world's largest and most

0:23

respected alternative asset managers with more than $400

0:26

billion in assets under management

0:29

and a market cap of over

0:31

$40 billion. Aries is a top

0:33

player in real estate, private equity,

0:35

secondaries, and many other businesses. But

0:38

what really makes them stand out is

0:40

their prowess in private credit. Aries is

0:42

one of the biggest direct lenders in

0:44

the world, and that's no accident. Today,

0:46

I'm so excited to find out how

0:48

Mike built up that business and where

0:51

he thinks this red hot asset class

0:53

is going next. So, Mike, welcome

0:55

to the program. I'm so happy to be here. Thank you. So,

0:57

let's start right at the beginning. You

0:59

graduated from Yale, where you majored

1:01

in ethics, politics, and economics, then

1:04

went on to a storied investment

1:06

bank called Kitter Peabody, which

1:09

I'm probably one of the few people left on Wall

1:11

Street who knows what that is. So, what

1:13

attracted you to a career in finance and

1:15

do you have any memories from that first

1:17

job? Yeah, it's so funny because now

1:20

that I have a college-age son and watching

1:22

him go through his own process, you

1:25

realize just how little you really know

1:27

when you get out of college. I

1:29

always had an entrepreneurial bent, like a

1:31

desire to build businesses, but I didn't

1:33

really know what a career in finance

1:35

would mean. Candidly, I graduated early in

1:38

three years, and I had

1:40

no friends around me that were actually going

1:42

through the job process. So, luckily, someone who

1:44

I was friends with the year prior to

1:46

me got me this job at Kitter Peabody.

1:49

Sounded pretty cool. The pay was good. I think it was $26,000

1:51

back then, which

1:53

was quite exciting. And I went

1:55

for it, and the rest

1:57

is history. The funny thing is now, here

2:00

running Aries and talking about

2:02

culture and the younger generation.

2:05

The memory I had was just I don't think I've ever

2:07

worked that hard. I don't know if I ever will. I

2:09

know that you know this, but it was 100 plus

2:12

hour weeks constantly. My

2:14

first apartment was across the street from

2:16

the office. So Kidder P. Body was

2:19

a bad. But

2:21

that was how I said I'm going to cope.

2:23

So it was 10 hundred square. My apartment was

2:25

300 square. So I

2:28

lived for two years in this hundred yard

2:31

radius. But the reason it was a

2:33

good memory is to have a bed

2:35

that close to the office proved to

2:37

be quite the asset for the entire

2:39

group of analysts and associates there. So

2:41

it's like that movie, The Apartment, where

2:43

everyone has a key to Mike's apartment.

2:45

But it was an incredible training ground

2:47

and just the discipline and the work

2:49

ethic and the attention to detail. It

2:51

was a great foundation for me. Yeah.

2:53

Did you grow up in New York? I grew up in New

2:55

York. I was in the suburbs. So I was familiar with the

2:58

city, but I don't know why I chose it. It went kind

3:00

of over square back then. Literally

3:02

if I had to go grocery shopping, I had to get on

3:04

the subway and go to 14th Street. I

3:06

remember that. I remember that. I

3:09

did the opposite. Like when

3:11

I started down at Drexel in 1981, I

3:13

decided to do exactly the opposite. I got

3:15

an apartment on the Upper West Side under

3:17

the theory that even if I went home

3:19

at two in the morning, I would at

3:21

least see the city on my ride home

3:23

and my ride back home

3:25

would maybe pass Lincoln Center or something that would give me

3:27

some joy. You'd probably pass that in the back of the

3:29

car and miss it anyway. I'm sure I did many nights,

3:31

but I had the exact opposite view because my dad had

3:33

said, you should get an apartment downtown because it will be

3:36

easy. But I took a different tact. But I liked the

3:38

$24,000 a year. Actually

3:40

fun fact, Ken Mollis and I started the same

3:42

year at Drexel, $36,000 a year. And

3:46

I was shocked that somebody was willing to

3:48

pay me that much money. Yeah, that's incredible.

3:50

Yeah. All right. So back

3:52

to your career. Aries in 2004. So

3:55

the short answer is Bennett Rosenthal and

3:58

back to the whole Drexel connection. I

4:01

left Kitter with a bunch of Drexel

4:03

alums to go to a place called

4:05

Indosuez Capital, which if you actually look

4:07

at who was there and what we

4:09

were doing, a lot of folks that

4:11

are now actually prominent in private credit

4:13

did some time there, including my current

4:15

partners at Run Credit. And we were

4:17

very early partnering with a French bank

4:20

to make middle market loans to private

4:22

equity firms, but in a way that

4:24

feels a lot like the business now.

4:27

And in 1997,

4:30

we were looking to expand and we

4:32

interviewed Bennett, my now very close friend

4:35

and partner, because he had worked for

4:37

Les Lieberman as an associate at Drexel.

4:40

And I was working for Les at the time. And

4:42

so we snipped each other out a little bit.

4:44

And then ultimately Bennett chose to move

4:47

to LA and go work at Apollo and

4:49

then ultimately spun out Aries. And he called

4:51

me in 2003 to say,

4:53

hey, we're building this thing and we

4:55

see this opportunity in private credit. Do

4:57

you want to join? And it just

4:59

so happens that we had spun out

5:01

of yet another bank. We

5:04

had a portfolio of assets. We had a team

5:06

of about 15 people. And so we joined forces

5:08

and the rest is history. Yeah, I never knew

5:10

that story about Bennett. Well, Bennett likes to joke.

5:13

You had two New Yorkers, fairly young at the

5:15

time. Hair gel was still a thing.

5:18

We were sizing each other up. And the way he tells

5:20

it is I'm sitting there, I'm looking at this young guy

5:22

with the slick back hair. And I'm like,

5:24

I really like this guy, but I don't know. And

5:27

I tell him I was thinking the exact same

5:29

thing when I met him. So it was that

5:31

careers are all about the people that you encounter

5:33

and those relationships. And Bennett obviously had good vision

5:36

to understand the opportunity. But obviously we trusted each

5:38

other. And so it was a big move for

5:40

him. And it was a big move for us,

5:42

too. All right. So has

5:44

Aries always been a player in direct lending? Can

5:46

you give us some of the history there? So

5:49

the answer is yes. The firm actually

5:51

got its start managing market value CLOs,

5:54

which again, people don't talk a lot

5:56

about, but probably the worst investment vehicle

5:59

ever invented. just in the sense of

6:01

the mark to market and the asset

6:03

liability mismatch. But what was great about

6:05

it was it gave you the flexibility

6:08

to invest in liquid credit, illiquid credit,

6:10

equities, etc. So I think one of

6:13

the reasons that we are as well

6:15

positioned as we are today is our

6:17

first funds were go anywhere investment vehicles.

6:20

And the earliest partners and teams

6:22

were investing in equities, bonds

6:25

and loans, CLO securities

6:27

and mezzanine, which in

6:29

the early days of private credit was

6:31

how a non-bank would participate in the

6:33

mezzanine business. And the way

6:36

that we came together with Bennett at

6:38

the time was we were sourcing a

6:40

ton of private credit at the time and

6:42

were effectively partnering with those early vehicles

6:44

on these mezzanine investments. So there was an

6:46

understanding of that business. But I think

6:48

even in the early days, and this

6:50

is where some of the early mover advantage

6:53

came in, most people were still wired

6:55

to the capital markets. They were coming

6:57

at the illiquid credit market from the perspective

6:59

of the loan and bond market or

7:01

the private equity market where you were the

7:03

client. So you would sit around, you

7:05

wait for the phone to ring, someone

7:07

would show you the deal, you'd evaluate it.

7:10

And we were trained through our banking

7:12

background to go out and really source

7:15

and originate. So yeah, Aries

7:17

has always been buying private credit. But I

7:20

think the big pivot for us is

7:22

when we decided to really invest,

7:24

grow the BDC was that early

7:26

emphasis on going out and sourcing

7:29

and really creating our own flow.

7:32

So for our listeners, I want to

7:34

ask a really basic question. What does

7:36

it really mean to run a direct

7:38

lending business? I think our listeners will

7:40

be familiar with the basic idea. You

7:42

raise money from investors, you use that

7:44

money to make loans to businesses, which

7:46

they hopefully repay with interest. But how

7:48

does that business function on a day-to-day

7:50

basis? And where is the value really

7:52

created? It's a great question because it's

7:54

a very simple business as you articulate it that way.

7:56

But it's complicated because in order to do it, we're

7:58

going to have to do it. Well, you have to

8:01

do it at scale. You have

8:03

to do it repeatedly. And

8:05

it seems easier than it is. Because if

8:07

you think about credit generally, it's great when

8:10

it works. But the problem with the asset

8:12

class is if you do everything right, you

8:14

get your coupon. And if you're wrong,

8:16

you can actually lose all your money. And

8:18

so it is, from an asymmetric risk standpoint,

8:21

it's probably a pretty bad asset class. So

8:23

the goal in direct

8:25

lending is not to lose

8:27

money while continuing to capture excess

8:29

return. And so the way that you

8:31

have to think about building value is

8:33

you have to create broad origination networks

8:36

in local markets so that you can

8:38

get to deals before other people see

8:40

them. And you have to surround those

8:43

deals with flexible capital, scaled

8:45

capital, and real client service. Because

8:48

ultimately, the reason that people are

8:50

borrowing in the private market, they're

8:52

getting some creativity and structure or

8:54

terms for some innovation

8:56

around your ability to grow with them

8:58

and support their business plan that they're

9:00

not getting somewhere else. And

9:02

so I think we learned early that

9:04

the tip of the spear for value

9:06

creation is origination. And that sounds so

9:09

simple, but it's really hard to do.

9:11

And the reason it's hard to do is we say no to our clients 95% of

9:16

the time. And when you're trained in banking,

9:18

you try to say yes to your clients 95%

9:20

of the time. And

9:23

pivoting to the point where we can actually

9:25

be a real valued partner to our clients

9:27

but not get to yes all the time

9:30

takes some getting used to. And you have to

9:32

build trust over decades, not years,

9:35

decades, where you're supporting people and

9:37

helping them make money and going

9:39

through bad situations, et cetera. So

9:41

origination's important relationship is key.

9:43

And I think that's key in all

9:45

of our businesses. But when people used

9:47

to say relationship lending, we

9:49

would cringe because that just means you're

9:52

mispricing risk, right? Now when

9:54

we talk about relationship lending, it's really through

9:56

the lens of people have choices. They choose

9:58

to do business with the people. that

10:00

they trust and that are aligned to whatever

10:02

their vision is and that's not easy to

10:04

build. And then I think you really have

10:07

to think about these markets as evolving, right?

10:09

You have to be constantly innovating around the

10:11

service and the product that you deliver to

10:13

your client. There were a lot of folks

10:15

that started in the business when we did

10:17

who were very anchored in mezzanine because that's

10:20

what was available. And when the market started

10:22

to innovate around things like unitronches,

10:24

right? Or even covenant light, you could

10:26

get anchored on the old way of

10:29

doing things, but today, private credit is

10:31

not just lending money to middle market

10:33

companies, it's lending money to

10:36

infrastructure projects and real estate assets

10:38

and structured credit and partnering with

10:41

banks on balance sheet solutions. So

10:43

it's become this whole new pillar in the

10:46

capital markets. It's actually a pretty, pretty exciting

10:48

place to be. So I want

10:50

to get back to innovating later because Aries is

10:52

certainly at the forefront of innovating in your industry.

10:54

But before I do that, I want to talk

10:56

about you as a leader, you

10:59

became CEO at the start of 2018,

11:01

taking over from Tony Ressler. So I

11:03

want to understand what that transition was

11:05

like at the Aries level in terms

11:07

of the company. But as importantly, what

11:09

was it like for you personally? And

11:12

did you feel like you had to change

11:15

from being more of an investor to a

11:17

leader? It's a great question. So

11:19

I was fortunate when I took the job

11:21

in 2018, I had been the president and

11:25

CEO of Aries for six years prior. So

11:28

I had already gotten a lot of

11:30

reps in running the company. And

11:33

a lot of the growth that we enjoyed

11:35

and the diversification globally came through the credit

11:37

side of the business. So I felt connected

11:39

to a lot of the parts of the

11:41

business when I took that role. That

11:43

said, it's almost like when you get married,

11:45

things change. I was with my wife for

11:48

10 years and you say to yourself, we're going

11:50

to get married, it's going to be the same.

11:53

But when you do, it's serious. Things matter more.

11:55

They have consequences. And so I did experience the

11:58

transition from CEO and president.

12:00

president to CEO as a

12:02

deeper sense of responsibility and a more

12:04

profound sense of service to the

12:06

teams and the company. And that was pretty

12:09

energizing. It is a tough transition because if

12:11

you grow up your whole life in the

12:13

deal business, you get into a rhythm of

12:16

just transacting and it's really

12:18

energizing. Closing deals is incredible.

12:21

And we all get hooked on it. And when

12:23

you stop doing that, you have to find the

12:25

way to scratch that itch. So I'd

12:27

like to think one of the reasons why

12:29

we're so growthy in the way that we

12:31

approach our business is because I've effectively looked

12:33

at Aries Management as my deal. I want

12:36

to invest in it the same

12:38

way I used to invest in businesses, but

12:40

do it all in one place. So I've

12:42

been able to find whether it's through M&A

12:44

or new product development to go back to

12:46

my roots on the investing side because that's

12:49

why I got into the business in the

12:51

first place. But it's a tough transition and

12:53

the cadence of business is different too. We

12:55

don't get the immediate gratification. Right. It's longer

12:57

term. Strategic focus. Private equity folks,

13:00

and I say this lovingly and with

13:02

a lot of self-awareness, we're great at telling

13:04

other people how to do succession, but we're

13:06

usually pretty bad at it ourselves. I mean,

13:09

we're kind of experts in organizational design, but

13:11

we're usually pretty bad at shining the light

13:13

on ourselves. And I think as we and

13:15

others in our industry have matured, we've gotten

13:18

much more professionalized and institutionalized in the way

13:20

that we think about things. But the one

13:22

thing we knew was that

13:24

any good succession requires forethought and

13:26

planning and a lot of trust,

13:29

but it also requires the person

13:31

who is vacating the seat to actually

13:34

make room. And Tony,

13:36

I think better than anybody,

13:38

understood that. And his

13:40

transition was probably harder than mine, right?

13:42

To go from a CEO to a

13:44

chairman and really allow for decisions to

13:46

be getting made and to trust those.

13:49

But he did what he was supposed to do

13:51

and gave me a lot of runway and a

13:53

lot of leeway and a lot of support. And

13:55

I think it's a really good example of what

13:57

good succession looks like. And I'm hoping that now

13:59

is a pretty cultural lightning rod for the rest

14:01

of the firm to understand how we do it

14:03

in the future. Yeah, sounds like he's

14:05

a great leader in having recognized that. Yeah.

14:07

I'm going to go off the piece for a

14:10

minute and ask you how would you describe

14:12

your leadership style? And if I was here with

14:14

the 10 most senior people at Aries who

14:16

report to you, how would they

14:18

describe your leadership style? I'd like to think of

14:20

myself a little bit as a servant leader. I

14:23

tend to lead from within

14:25

as opposed to from without like

14:27

in the trenches with people. I

14:31

am pretty hands-on but not micromanager

14:33

in the sense that I'm engaged

14:35

and there to help. I'd

14:37

like to think that I'm approaching my leadership with

14:39

a sense of humility, which is empowering to the

14:42

people that work for me because I don't think

14:44

that they perceive me as having

14:46

interest in anything other than supporting their

14:48

growth and success. Our values

14:50

as a company, it's interesting. One of

14:52

them is self-awareness, which I always

14:54

struggled with because sometimes it could sound pretty

14:57

arrogant to say we're self-aware. But what we

14:59

tried to capture with that was an idea

15:01

that we have a willingness to fail and

15:03

not dwell on it, right? And that we've

15:05

built trust with each other that we can

15:07

actually make mistakes so that

15:09

we can move forward. And I think I'm

15:11

a compassionate leader in that sense where I

15:13

think I'm trying to push people outside of

15:15

their comfort zone and doing it in a

15:17

way where they feel supported to go out

15:19

and take those types of risks. And I

15:22

think that mindset around risk-taking and growth has

15:24

been a big part of our success. So

15:26

your recent growth has been really amazing.

15:29

Aries carved out a niche in what's

15:31

become probably the single hottest area in

15:33

finance. I think Forbes called it the

15:35

sexiest business on Wall Street. Okay, you

15:37

can say that. I just call it

15:40

hot. And you've

15:42

done an amazing job of capitalizing on

15:44

the opportunity. So you've always

15:46

had a successful business. But was

15:48

there a specific moment when you

15:50

realized you were onto something much

15:52

bigger? And is there a lesson

15:55

there? Is it more about foresight, about knowing

15:57

where the opportunity is coming from? Or is

15:59

it about capitalizing on it when it comes.

16:02

I think it's both. I think it's both in

16:05

each of our businesses. We

16:07

were religious planners, right? So

16:10

we are annual strategic

16:12

plans and budgets and three and five

16:14

year growth plans. And then what

16:16

we would call moonshot scenarios where if

16:18

X, Y or Z happens, what does

16:21

it mean for us? And so we

16:23

go into each of our

16:25

business builds with a really good roadmap

16:28

for what we think success looks like.

16:30

And that's important, whether you're doing something

16:32

organically or you're doing something inorganically, because

16:34

again, everyone needs to know what success

16:36

looks like in order to celebrate it

16:38

and know when you got there. And

16:40

the planning is a big part of

16:43

it. And then I guess that's the

16:45

foresight and being open to things happening.

16:47

But when you see things opening, you

16:49

have to have a willingness to invest

16:51

behind growth. And that goes back

16:53

to this risk taking because you never really

16:56

know. I can't say that we knew that

16:58

direct lending would grow to be what

17:00

it is today, but we knew what

17:02

it took to be successful. We had

17:04

identified how big we thought these addressable

17:06

markets were. We made the investments.

17:09

If I think about our European direct lending

17:11

business, for example, which is a a

17:13

large market player now, we

17:16

started building teams across the continent in 2006.

17:19

We didn't make money in that business for, you know,

17:22

five or six years. And it's

17:24

hard, especially when you're in a small

17:26

partnership and you're making investments with

17:29

a long payoff to really sustain those.

17:31

And so I think we've always had

17:33

good vision of where we wanted to

17:35

go and an openness to what the

17:37

possibilities were. But I don't think anybody

17:39

in our business, private markets generally could

17:41

ever have really appreciated how large the

17:44

private market opportunity would be with private credit, obviously at

17:46

the top of the list. Yeah, I would

17:48

say the same about the private equity business for those

17:50

of us who were involved in the 80s and 90s.

17:53

I don't think any of us ever could

17:55

have imagined that it would be such an

17:57

important part of the global economy today. Yeah.

17:59

Look, you have to trust your own. instincts

18:02

and filter too. So going back to even

18:04

private credit, private credit has evolved. You know,

18:06

it was fairly cottage. It served a purpose

18:08

in the market supporting private equity firms, but

18:11

it was not very innovative,

18:13

right? It was high rate coupon

18:15

mezzanine with warrants. And

18:18

as the market started to evolve, if you were not

18:20

willing to evolve with it and many weren't, you got

18:22

left behind. So there were a

18:24

lot of people that were early to this.

18:26

But to your point about foresight, but seeing

18:28

the evolution just kind of missed it. And

18:31

so that goes back to that self-awareness point

18:33

of challenge things like could this

18:35

be more where could we grow or is

18:37

the growth inappropriate and don't chase it? There have

18:40

been a number of opportunities that we've looked at

18:42

where we haven't pursued it

18:44

because we just didn't trust it and didn't

18:46

feel like we could bring the competitive advantage

18:48

or insight to a market where we

18:50

would actually win. So part of it is just you

18:53

hone that filter over time with your partners

18:55

and hopefully it gets better. You know, the more

18:57

you do. It's sensible. Yeah. So

19:00

I mentioned Aries incredible growth and much of

19:02

the actual core team has stayed together for

19:04

25 years. So

19:06

how did you keep the band, so

19:09

to speak, together for so long and

19:11

how much do you think keeping that

19:13

core DNA of that team yourself? Kip

19:15

Devere, Mitch Goldstein, Michael Smith was

19:18

a driver of Aries success. I

19:20

think it's the biggest driver of our success.

19:23

And it goes back to my comments

19:25

about Tony. You know, investing is all

19:27

about trust because you're not right all

19:30

the time and you have to defend

19:32

an idea and take real risk behind

19:34

it. And if you're doing it with

19:37

partners, you have to trust one

19:39

another. And trust is hard generally

19:41

as a human. It's hard at

19:43

scale. Right. Back to what kind of leader

19:45

am I or what's the culture? We're

19:48

fortunate that we all grew up in the

19:50

business together. Right. And so when you're best

19:52

friends in the world or your business partners

19:54

and you go through cycles together, it just

19:57

becomes easier to do things. Right.

19:59

There's. There's no second guessing.

20:02

There's no body who's not holding up their

20:05

end of the bargain. Everybody's just running at

20:07

speed together. And so if I go back

20:09

to those early days of

20:11

the smaller partnership, and I would add

20:13

Tony and Benetton, John Kiswick and others

20:15

to that list, deep sense of trust

20:18

emerged. And so the people who are

20:20

partners at Aries now were analysts here

20:22

20 years ago. And

20:24

so they saw that. And they've role

20:26

modeled it and repeated it and replicated it.

20:28

So I do think the culture here is

20:30

a really big driver of our success. And

20:34

unlike others in our business, this is a

20:36

team sport. I think most people who thrive

20:38

at Aries want to be part of a

20:41

team. They want to be part of a team that's

20:43

winning, but doing it together. Whereas

20:45

I think certain investment houses are more about

20:48

who's the star athlete on that team and

20:50

how do they win. And we've tried, because

20:52

of this DNA and this friendship, to not

20:54

let the ego seep into the business. And

20:57

I think that's been a big benefit to

20:59

us. Don't know if it works for everybody,

21:01

but it's definitely worked for us. Well, it

21:03

certainly works here at Goldman. I mean, I

21:05

think the continuity of leadership and the fact

21:07

that our partnership can be, I always say,

21:09

constructively contentious with one another. We get to

21:11

better outcomes. We see that. We

21:13

see that too. So what's also

21:16

amazing is that you have

21:18

grown without sacrificing the culture. And

21:21

as a leader, how do you maintain

21:23

a tight-knit culture as you've grown so

21:25

quickly? It changes over

21:27

time. And this has been part of my own

21:30

evolution as a leader. When you're

21:32

smaller and younger, you don't

21:35

really talk about culture. You just model it.

21:37

Like this is what good culture looks and

21:39

feels like, because you can have a personal

21:41

relationship with most of the people

21:44

in your company. And then as

21:46

you grow, you begin to understand that

21:48

you have to define who you

21:51

are and what you stand for as a company. And

21:54

we've done that where we've basically articulated who

21:56

we are, who we want to be, what

21:58

our mission and values are. and we've tried

22:00

to align people to that. And

22:04

that's been incredibly energizing, productive

22:06

and a big leap forward for

22:08

us because you move away from

22:10

this idea of culture is

22:12

what happens in the office every day to this

22:15

sense of higher purpose and calling, which

22:18

again, done at scale is really powerful.

22:20

So, employees there, as we talk about

22:22

culture and the reason for that is

22:25

great culture can drive out performance,

22:27

right? It can drive out performance

22:30

around the investment committee table. It

22:32

can drive out performance at the company

22:34

level, provide stability and

22:36

frankly, it's just a better work

22:39

environment. You retain talent, people feel

22:41

more fulfilled. So, we talk about

22:43

cultural a lot and

22:46

it's so interesting now because we've gotten so

22:48

global and so diverse, but the culture has

22:50

gotten stronger because we're just finding interesting people

22:52

from all walks of life and all over

22:55

the globe that are aligning to our values.

22:57

And so, the conversation for us always comes back

23:00

to service and values and understanding why

23:02

we come to work every day, not just what

23:04

do we do for work and it's

23:06

working, but it's hard. At scale, it's really hard.

23:08

You have to really work at it and

23:10

you have to be willing to adjust it too, right?

23:13

I think we have found what worked 10 years ago

23:15

doesn't work now and I'm pretty sure 10 years from

23:17

now, we're going to have to do different

23:19

things to make sure that the culture stays intact,

23:22

but it's been a blessing so far. Have

23:24

you ever read those books, Seven Habits

23:26

of Highly Effective People? And there's one,

23:29

Seven Habits of Highly Effective Families. Somebody

23:31

should probably write one, Seven Habits of

23:33

Highly Effective Companies. But if you read

23:35

those books, they talk about having a

23:38

moral-based or character-based or value-based

23:40

home or center and then

23:42

every decision you make comes

23:44

from that and therefore,

23:46

it's very sensible and thoughtful. Yeah,

23:49

and I think people pay us to generate

23:51

investment returns. So that is what we do

23:53

for a living, but what we try to

23:55

talk about, which makes it very powerful, is

23:57

you think about who benefits from our investment

24:00

returns. returns. We manage money for state

24:02

pension plans and insurance companies and

24:04

retirement portfolios. Like when you really

24:06

drill down the tens

24:08

of millions of lives that are dependent on

24:11

our returns, that changes the game, right? Now

24:13

you're not just showing up and saying, how

24:15

do I generate return and promote? You're saying,

24:17

how do I actually not mess this up?

24:20

Because I've got 20 million people who are

24:22

relying on me doing my job. And so

24:25

we have created a real sense of responsibility

24:27

at the company that I think

24:29

is pretty unique in our business. So I'm

24:31

curious for your view on the outlook for

24:33

direct lending given the current economic cycle. To

24:35

a lot of people, the asset class seemed

24:37

to almost come out of nowhere in the

24:39

past few years. But of course, it's been

24:42

around a long time and Aries knows that.

24:44

But where do you think it's going next?

24:46

There's a scientific term, I'm not gonna remember the

24:49

name for it, but I will ping you after

24:51

this conversation, which is the term

24:53

to describe when you see something

24:55

that you haven't seen before that's been there all

24:57

along, you can't stop seeing it. It's like ocular

24:59

or something. And I only mentioned that because in

25:01

every other part of your life, it happens to

25:04

you every day. Like you see something on the

25:06

street that's been there for 20 years and you

25:08

never noticed it before you walk by it and

25:10

all of a sudden, you can't stop looking at

25:12

it. That's what's happening in direct lending right now.

25:14

This is a market that has been here

25:17

for 30 years. And it's been

25:19

just chugging away. And interestingly, when you

25:21

look at the growth of private credit,

25:23

it's grown a little less than 15%

25:26

compound for the last 10 years. Guess

25:28

what? So has private equity grown 15%. The loan

25:31

and high yield market have grown in the low double

25:33

digits. The reason I think private

25:35

credit is being perceived as growing

25:38

faster is it's just a straight line compounder. So

25:41

there's no ups or downs. You don't have an

25:43

up 30, a down 20, there's no draw downs.

25:45

And so it just keeps clipping

25:47

away at 10 to 15%. And

25:50

then all of a sudden, the numbers

25:52

get pretty large, but there's nothing to

25:54

evidence that it's grown disproportionate to other

25:57

parts of the capital markets, which is how we get

25:59

recentered. on are people

26:01

taking inappropriate risks or what's

26:04

the right pricing for the risk that we're

26:06

taking. And so I think direct lending and

26:08

private credit still have a long, long way

26:11

to go. There are structural

26:13

things at play just in terms

26:15

of the aging of the population

26:18

and people's desire for dependable yield

26:20

that's creating demand for private credit.

26:22

The private equity ecosystem continues to

26:24

grow and expand. That's creating demand

26:26

for private credit. The loan

26:28

and high yield markets continue to move to scale

26:31

and they're servicing ever larger borrowers.

26:33

That's creating demand. Commercial

26:35

banks around the globe are dealing with

26:38

new regulatory capital frameworks and particularly in

26:40

this rate environment. That's seeing

26:42

transition of assets. So there's a lot of

26:44

just secular tailwinds for direct lending. Putting aside

26:47

the globalization, which is one of the things

26:49

that excites me the most because when I

26:51

look at what we've been able to do

26:53

in Europe in the last 15 years, what

26:57

we're building in the Asia Pacific

26:59

markets, these private credit themes

27:01

are in place in those markets, but

27:03

the markets aren't nearly as evolved. Even

27:06

if you allow for some maturation of

27:08

the US market, it will still be

27:10

a very large capital market. It

27:12

may not be growing 15%. It may be growing

27:15

8% or 10%, but there are markets that haven't

27:17

even opened up yet. That if you're

27:19

early and you're willing to take risk

27:21

and make investments in those markets, I think there's

27:23

huge growth. How is Aries

27:26

positioning itself to get ahead of all

27:28

of those themes that you mentioned? Yeah,

27:30

we're making investments and we're executing on

27:32

the same playbook. We

27:34

have a fully developed origination

27:36

and investment footprint across the

27:38

Asia Pacific region. We're

27:41

putting people in offices with a really diverse

27:43

set of product to go find deals. It's

27:45

like the old days here. Maybe

27:48

you asked the question earlier about what it was

27:51

like back then. When you go into these markets,

27:53

you do get a feel, you get a little

27:55

taste of the good old days because they're running

27:57

around these markets in a way that we were

27:59

here. 25, 30 years ago. So you

28:02

got to do that. And then in certain parts of

28:04

the world, for example, we have a partnership with Vinci

28:06

Partners, which is a Latin American based

28:08

alternative asset manager. We have a long

28:10

term view that the Latin American markets

28:13

will evolve and open up over time.

28:16

It's a little bit too far afield for us to take

28:18

on right now. So we're doing it through

28:20

partnership. But again, we're keeping those options open, right? We

28:22

want a front row seat to the development of these

28:24

markets. And so if we can't do it directly, we're

28:27

going to do it through partners who can help educate

28:29

us so that when those markets turn, we want to

28:31

be there. Whenever something gets really

28:33

hot, there are inevitably questions. And some

28:36

people wonder if private credit can stay

28:38

hot if rates fall. And conversely, some

28:40

worry that rising rates will be a

28:42

problem for private credit because borrowers could

28:44

have a harder time paying back their

28:46

floating rate loans. But I want your

28:48

perspective. How do you think about the

28:50

dynamic between interest rates and direct lending

28:53

returns? It's always one of those things

28:55

to your point when things get quote unquote hot. People

28:57

always worry that there's risk there that they

28:59

don't understand. And I get that because sometimes

29:01

it's true. And sometimes when something

29:04

is too good to be true, it

29:07

could just be that good. So the

29:09

reason that private credit is so attractive

29:12

is it's a floating rate

29:14

asset, short duration, self structured,

29:16

self negotiated, actively managed in

29:18

partnership, usually with some sophisticated

29:20

owner of a company or

29:22

an asset. And the components

29:24

of return are upfront fee, base

29:26

rate, credit spread and some form

29:28

of call protection. And so

29:30

the way the asset class functions is when

29:33

rates go up, credit spreads moderate.

29:35

And if rates are going down

29:38

in response to weakening economic fundamentals,

29:40

credit spreads gap out. So

29:42

if you look at the history, at least through the

29:44

Aries lens, while you make more

29:46

money in markets like this, you don't give

29:48

it back when rates start to recede, because

29:50

when they do, you're either

29:52

restructuring some parts of your book and

29:55

getting incremental compensation and then the new

29:57

loans that you make are coming at

29:59

significantly wider. credit spread that tend

30:01

to overcompensate for whatever the reduction

30:03

in the base rate is. So,

30:06

it presents a surprisingly stable total

30:08

return to the investor. I think

30:10

that's one of the reasons why it's

30:13

getting so much uptake in the investor

30:15

community because when you go back and

30:17

you actually underwrite the history of returns,

30:19

it's durable. We're making money when rates

30:21

are going up. We're making money when

30:23

rates are going down. We're making money

30:25

in volatile markets and good markets, but

30:27

it's the components of return change. We

30:29

do have to have the full product

30:31

set and ability to move around those

30:34

different components, which speaks again to the

30:36

scale of your capital, how flexible is

30:38

it to pivot and move. But if

30:40

you can, you're going to capture whatever

30:42

the market return is and generally it's

30:44

pretty range-bound. You've also been

30:46

leaning into asset-based lending or alternative credit

30:49

as a growth area over the last

30:51

five years. And for our listeners, can

30:53

you explain what that is, where you

30:55

see that going, and are there other

30:58

growth areas for areas that you're looking

31:00

to build up, including you talked about

31:02

Latin America, but from other geographic perspectives?

31:05

Yeah. So, alternative credit and asset-based finance

31:07

is probably one of the hotter corners

31:09

of the, as you described, hot private

31:12

credit market. And I think

31:14

that's a function of a couple of things.

31:16

One, it is squarely in the middle of

31:18

this bank balance sheet conversation that has been

31:20

happening over the last two years. Two,

31:23

with the continued growth in

31:26

alternative asset manager affiliated insurance

31:28

platforms, you're beginning to see

31:30

more linkage between those

31:33

insurance companies and the growth in

31:35

the rated side of the asset-based

31:37

finance market. And three, as

31:40

we are getting larger and folks like us

31:42

are getting larger, we're able to aggregate capital

31:44

and teams against this market opportunity in a

31:46

way that we couldn't 10

31:48

years ago. And it's simplest form in the

31:50

way that we think about it, if direct

31:53

lending is lending directly to a company or

31:55

to an asset, alternative credit is

31:58

lending to a of

32:00

assets, so long as those assets

32:02

generate cash flow. And so

32:04

that's everything from auto

32:06

receivables, credit card receivables,

32:09

shipping container leases, music

32:11

royalties, healthcare royalties, net

32:13

lease, residential solar securitizations. There's

32:16

20 plus end markets that we

32:18

participate in. And

32:20

what's so exciting about that, what I've always

32:23

loved about the private markets business is everywhere

32:25

you look is a private company. Whoever makes

32:27

the components on the microphones that we're speaking

32:29

into is a family owned company somewhere. And

32:31

when you get into the deep world of

32:34

alternative credit, things you do in your daily

32:36

life creates an asset with cash flow attached

32:38

to it. So when you start to really

32:40

walk down the street, and in fact, if

32:42

I pointed back, once you see it, you

32:45

can't unsee it. I look

32:47

around and all I see are securitizable

32:49

assets. And that's a little sad. I

32:51

know, it's pathetic. That's what makes

32:54

a market, right? Exactly. Because that

32:56

is why it's getting so much attention. Because

32:58

I think people are understanding as

33:00

the comfort level with these structures is

33:03

improving and the flexibility of the capital

33:05

that's available to the aggregators of these

33:07

assets is also improving in terms of

33:10

the ability to innovate and customize. It's

33:12

a pretty big world. And so rightfully so,

33:14

I think it's getting a lot of attention. Other places

33:16

we're spending a lot of time are in and around

33:19

real assets. So real estate lending,

33:21

infrastructure lending, some of that is around

33:23

opportunistic, where we think that we're just

33:25

going to see the install base of

33:28

credit needs some form of refinancing to

33:30

the new rate environment. And some of

33:32

it is just secular opportunities like the

33:34

next wave of data center rollouts that's

33:36

going to require trillions and trillions of

33:38

both debt and equity to come into

33:41

the market that doesn't currently exist. All

33:43

right, before we get away from your core business,

33:46

I just have to ask you from your seat,

33:48

how are you thinking about the economic outlook right

33:50

now? Because you sit atop of an

33:53

important global firm. And

33:55

we've seen widespread recession concerns

33:58

move to a fairly constructive end. outlook

34:00

for the economy globally. So how are

34:02

you thinking about the economic outlook right

34:04

now? It's hard to have

34:06

a single answer for a global picture, but

34:08

we do touch a lot of small companies

34:10

and assets and asset owners. And I would

34:12

say generally the tone is still very constructive.

34:15

We have been consistent in that view for at

34:17

least two plus years. So we were never on

34:19

the recession train. One of the benefits of having

34:22

the business we have is we're

34:24

getting real time information from our portfolios

34:26

and it's been constructive. Our

34:28

corporate portfolios are still growing in the

34:30

low double digit EBITDA range. Our real

34:33

estate portfolios are growing in a Y.

34:35

So it's clear that growth will slow. It is

34:38

slowing. The consumer is quite resilient now and

34:41

we're not alone in this view. I think

34:43

you're probably seeing it in your client base.

34:45

I think the commercial banks are seeing

34:47

it in their client base. And most of our private

34:49

credit peers, while we've seen some cracks

34:51

form in certain portfolios, I think

34:54

are generally running at default rates

34:56

significantly lower than historical average. I'm

34:58

still pretty constructive. Labor market's tight.

35:01

The system's working. So we've absorbed

35:03

a pretty significant rate shock

35:05

and nothing has in fact broken and

35:07

we're running in a good place here.

35:09

Yeah, I remain constructive. I'm happy to

35:12

hear that. Yeah. I'm going to leave here and a piano

35:14

is going to fall on my head by the way. No, no, no,

35:16

that won't happen. Not outside Goldman Sachs. So

35:18

you also have a family of funds called

35:20

the Pathfinder Funds. And I think these are

35:23

pretty amazing. Can you tell our listeners how

35:25

they work? Yeah, this is

35:27

one of the things I'm most proud of.

35:29

And we had a portfolio manager that joined

35:31

us, gosh, five or six years ago named

35:34

Joel Holsinger to start to guide

35:36

us through the next evolution of the growth

35:38

of our alternative credit business. And he had

35:40

an idea which we took

35:43

to that we wanted to have 10

35:45

percent of the carried interest in those

35:47

funds go to charitable causes that were

35:49

near and dear to his and his

35:51

team's heart. And we

35:53

had a very long conversation back

35:55

to the sense of purpose in

35:57

investing of aligning the profit we

36:00

generated to doing

36:02

good in the world, right? Do good, do well. And

36:05

so that was an eye

36:07

opening moment for us, because what we

36:09

saw was it changed the conversation internally

36:11

back to culture. And these are large

36:14

funds, right? This is a 40 billion

36:16

dollar business at this point. And we

36:18

very then quickly pivoted to stand up

36:20

the Aries Charitable Foundation, which was we

36:23

were going to take a percentage of

36:25

our promote and contribute it into the

36:27

Charitable Foundation and align

36:29

our performance to impact work.

36:32

And what's so exciting and cool about it

36:34

is the work that we're doing is in

36:37

areas where we actually can make a difference,

36:39

financial literacy, entrepreneurship, social equity.

36:42

And so we're going into the communities where

36:44

we live and work and invest, and we're

36:46

actually able to take our profit and put

36:48

it back in. And it's been really empowering

36:51

for our teams and our investors, because again,

36:53

I think they see our teams approaching their

36:55

business with a deeper sense of responsibility than

36:58

they were before. And it's

37:00

so funny how when you do something like

37:02

that and people see it, now I think

37:04

we have 10 teams around the firm that

37:06

are doing the same thing. They

37:08

said, I love what they did. I want

37:10

to do it too. And they're raising their

37:12

hand and doing it. So back to the

37:14

culture conversation, that's something that just happened organically,

37:16

right? We had to make the first

37:19

step. We had to be pushed to do it

37:21

and recognize it. But then once we did it,

37:23

it just took off. But that

37:25

says a lot about the people. It varies

37:27

because people want to work for mission-driven organizations.

37:29

Yeah, I think so. And

37:31

it probably helps you attract and retain your

37:33

talent too. All right, so I can't let

37:35

you go without asking you about the Baltimore

37:38

Orioles baseball team. I will

37:40

admit I'm a Yankees fan, so just

37:42

saying. But you're part of a group

37:44

that bought the baseball team along with

37:46

Carlisle Group's co-founder David Rubenstein earlier this

37:48

year. And are there any

37:50

lessons that you learned from running Aries

37:52

that you're applying to the way you

37:54

manage the Orioles team? It's

37:57

a great question. We have a large

37:59

sports and investing business. at Aries. So, away

38:01

from my deep involvement with the Orioles, I've

38:03

had an opportunity to kind of understand the

38:05

business of sports. The first thing I would

38:07

say is there's a real opportunity just to

38:10

modernize the business, right? A lot

38:13

of sports franchises, the Orioles

38:15

included, for better or for worse, are

38:17

family owned. They've been family owned for

38:19

decades, if not generations. And so, the

38:21

ability to come in with

38:24

a partner like David and bring best

38:27

practices in business to what

38:29

was effectively a family run business is pretty

38:31

exciting. So, there's just a lot to do

38:33

there. But maybe back to sense of purpose,

38:36

both David and I believe that the

38:38

Baltimore Orioles, while we own them, is

38:41

a community asset, right? And if

38:43

done well and the community

38:45

is appropriately engaged, you can have a

38:47

real impact on the city of Baltimore, right?

38:50

And so, we've tried to take that same

38:52

sense of responsibility and come in with

38:54

all humility and just say, if we could

38:56

do better here, meaning if we can

38:58

run a better business, if we can continue

39:01

to sustain great performance and ignite the fans,

39:03

if we can bring the community around

39:05

this thing, game changer for the city. And

39:07

so, we're having a lot of fun,

39:09

don't get me wrong. But we're doing it

39:11

in a way that I think is somewhat

39:14

unique in sports ownership in terms of

39:16

just the way that we're approaching

39:18

community engagement, the way that we're even engaging with

39:20

the fans in the stadium. And to your point,

39:22

it's different. In the old days, owners of sports

39:25

teams would sit up in some... Right box. ...

39:27

behind some dark window, never to be seen. And there was

39:29

this separation. And

39:33

the same way I think that the younger

39:35

generation of workers in our business want mission

39:38

and they want to be part of

39:40

something bigger and they want relatable leaders,

39:42

I think the same is true for

39:44

sports. So, when you walk around the

39:46

stadium as a fan, it's amazing how

39:48

engaged the fans feel with you and

39:50

the team. So, that was a big

39:52

lesson there of just kind of leaning

39:54

in on that because not necessarily what's

39:56

been done before, but it's still early.

39:58

But if the results... or any indication

40:00

it's working. Certainly is. So

40:03

we like to end these sessions with a lightning round. So

40:05

we're going to run through a couple of questions and just

40:07

to get a quick answer from you. Like

40:09

a one word answer. If you can

40:11

make one, two, three, try. I'm not that good

40:14

at short answers, but I'm going to try. OK.

40:16

So what was your first investment? First

40:18

investment was Charms Blow Pops that

40:20

I would buy for a nickel

40:23

in large bags, chop them up, and sell them

40:25

for $0.25 on the bus. Made

40:28

a killing. OK, I love that story. How

40:30

old are you when you did that? I was

40:33

probably 12. An entrepreneur from a young age. What

40:36

is your greatest strength as an investor? Healthy

40:38

skepticism, taking it slow. So

40:41

what's the best piece of advice that you have

40:43

ever received? All you have is

40:45

your reputation. I 100% agree with that. Which

40:49

investor do you admire most? Oh,

40:52

gosh, there's so many. I'm going

40:54

to go with Charlie Munger. It's

40:56

amazing how many people I interview on the show that

40:58

say that or Warren himself.

41:01

So how about your biggest mentor? Who's been your

41:03

biggest mentor? I've been fortunate to

41:05

have so many, both peer mentors and senior mentors.

41:08

This is someone we talked about earlier. I would

41:10

say John Kisek. You were lucky to have

41:12

him as mentor. Yes, I was. One of the highlights of

41:14

my life. So where do you spend your time

41:16

outside of the office? Oh,

41:18

gosh, golfing, fishing, playing the

41:20

guitar, Camden Yards, skiing.

41:24

And obviously, I have two teenage boys, so I try to spend

41:26

as much time with them as I can as well. Are

41:29

they baseball fans? They're Yankee fans. So we're

41:31

having a real problem in the Arrogate household

41:33

right now. All

41:36

right, so finally, what are you most excited about in

41:38

the world right now? I try. This

41:41

is not going to be a short answer, but I just

41:43

forgive me for this one. I struggle

41:45

today just given the pace

41:47

of information and all of

41:49

the headlines and speed

41:52

of news that we're losing the narrative. And so

41:54

what I'm actually most excited about is when you

41:56

just zoom out and you try not to get

41:58

caught up in the muck. the

42:00

arc of human progress is actually quite

42:03

remarkable, right? I mean, we're making huge

42:05

strides in global poverty reduction and medical

42:07

advancements and life expectancy. And I always

42:09

try whenever I'm getting sucked into the

42:12

headlines and all the partisan divisiveness just

42:14

to take a breath and kind of

42:16

get some historical perspective because there's a

42:18

lot to be excited about just in

42:20

terms of where we are and all

42:23

of the great things that happen day

42:25

to day that I think people take

42:27

for granted. It's good advice. So,

42:30

Mike, it was a pleasure having you on the

42:32

show. Thank you for joining us and sharing your

42:34

fascinating perspectives. It was a real treat. Thank you. So

42:36

thank you all for listening to this

42:39

special episode of Goldman Sachs exchanges, Great

42:41

Investors. I'm Alison Mass. This podcast was

42:43

recorded on June 4th, 2024. If

42:46

you enjoyed the show, we hope you

42:49

will follow us on Apple podcasts, Spotify,

42:51

YouTube or wherever you listen to your

42:53

podcasts. And leave us a rating and

42:55

a comment. The

43:00

opinions and views expressed in this program

43:02

may not necessarily reflect the institutional views

43:04

of Goldman Sachs or its affiliates. This

43:06

program should not be copied, distributed, published

43:09

or reproduced in whole or in part

43:11

or disclosed by any recipient to any

43:13

other person without the express written consent

43:15

of Goldman Sachs. Each name

43:17

of a third party organization mentioned in

43:19

this program is the property of the

43:21

company to which it relates is used

43:23

here strictly for informational and identification purposes

43:26

only and is not used to imply

43:28

any ownership or license rights between any

43:30

such company and Goldman Sachs. The content

43:32

of this program does not constitute a

43:34

recommendation from any Goldman Sachs entity to

43:36

the recipient and is provided for informational

43:39

purposes only. Goldman Sachs is not providing

43:41

any financial, economic, legal, investment, accounting or

43:43

tax advice through this program or to

43:45

its recipient. Certain information contained

43:47

in this program constitutes forward looking statements

43:49

and there's no guarantee that these results

43:51

will be achieved. Goldman Sachs has no

43:54

obligation to provide updates or changes to

43:56

the information in this program. Past performance

43:58

does not guarantee future results. which

44:00

may vary. Neither Goldman Sachs nor any

44:03

of its affiliates makes any representation or

44:05

warranty express or implied as to the

44:07

accuracy or completeness of the statements or

44:10

any information contained in this program and

44:12

any liability therefore, including in respect of

44:14

direct, indirect, or consequential loss or damage,

44:17

is expressly disclaimed.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features